Frontiers in Plant Science Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Frontiers in Plant Science formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Frontiers in Plant Science is one of the largest open-access journals in the plant biology field, publishing thousands of articles per year across topics from molecular biology to crop science, ecology, and biotechnology. It's part of the Frontiers journal family, which means it uses a distinctive formatting system and collaborative review process that differ from traditional publishers like Elsevier or Springer Nature. If you've only published with traditional journals, the Frontiers workflow will feel different. This guide covers everything you need to format your manuscript correctly.
Quick Answer: Frontiers in Plant Science Formatting Essentials
Original Research articles allow up to 12,000 words (8,000 for research articles in some specialty sections). Review articles also allow 12,000 words. The journal uses Frontiers reference style (author-year format). Both Word and LaTeX templates are provided. Figures have no strict quantity limit but must meet 300 DPI minimum. The journal is fully open access with an article processing charge.
Word Limits by Article Type
Frontiers in Plant Science publishes numerous article types, each with distinct length requirements. These limits are enforced during submission, and the system will reject manuscripts that exceed them.
Article Type | Word Limit | Abstract | Figures/Tables |
|---|---|---|---|
Original Research | 12,000 | 350 words | No fixed limit |
Review | 12,000 | 350 words | No fixed limit |
Mini Review | 3,000 | N/A | Up to 2 |
Brief Research Report | 4,000 | 200 words | Up to 4 combined |
Methods | 12,000 | 350 words | No fixed limit |
Perspective | 3,000 | N/A | Up to 2 |
Hypothesis and Theory | 12,000 | 350 words | No fixed limit |
Data Report | 3,000 | 200 words | Up to 4 |
Correction | 1,000 | N/A | As needed |
The word limits include the abstract, body text, figure legends, and acknowledgments but exclude references. This is different from journals that only count body text, so watch your total carefully. A 12,000-word limit sounds generous, but once you subtract the abstract (350 words), figure legends (often 500+ words), and acknowledgments, you're working with roughly 10,000-11,000 words of actual body text.
Some specialty sections within Frontiers in Plant Science apply tighter limits. Research articles submitted to certain sections cap at 8,000 words. Check the specific section you're targeting before writing.
Abstract Requirements
Frontiers in Plant Science requires unstructured abstracts for most article types. The maximum length is 350 words for Original Research and Review articles.
The abstract should cover:
- Background and motivation (1-2 sentences)
- Objective or hypothesis
- Methods overview (briefly)
- Main results with quantitative data
- Conclusions and implications
Unlike journals that require structured abstracts with headings (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions), Frontiers uses a flowing paragraph format. However, the content should still follow a logical sequence from context through findings to significance.
Frontiers explicitly states that abstracts should not include citations, undefined abbreviations, or references to figures or tables in the manuscript. Keep it self-contained.
Mini Reviews and Perspectives don't require a separate abstract. Instead, the first paragraph of the text serves as an introduction that provides context for readers.
Manuscript Template: Use It
Frontiers provides official manuscript templates for both Word and LaTeX, and using one is strongly recommended. The templates handle all journal-specific formatting, including section structure, heading styles, reference formatting, and figure placement.
Where to get templates:
- Word template: Available from the Frontiers author guidelines page
- LaTeX template: Available from the same page, with a .cls file and example .tex document
- Overleaf: Frontiers templates are also available directly in Overleaf
The Word template uses specific heading styles (Heading 1, Heading 2, etc.) that map to the Frontiers production system. Don't override these styles with manual formatting. If the template uses 12-point Times New Roman for body text, keep it that way. The production team will reject manuscripts that use non-standard formatting, even if the content is identical.
Figure and Table Specifications
Frontiers in Plant Science doesn't impose a fixed limit on the number of figures for Original Research and Review articles. However, every figure should be necessary and clearly referenced in the text.
Figure requirements:
- Minimum resolution: 300 DPI for all figure types
- Accepted formats: TIFF, JPEG, PNG, EPS, or PDF
- Maximum file size: 10 MB per figure
- Figure width: 85 mm (single column) or 180 mm (full width)
- Font in figures: Arial or Helvetica, minimum 8-point after sizing
- Panel labels: uppercase letters (A, B, C) in bold
- Scale bars required on all microscopy and imaging panels
- Color figures are free (open access, no print edition)
Table requirements:
- Tables must be created using the Word table function or LaTeX tabular environment
- Every column must have a header
- Avoid vertical lines
- Use horizontal lines to separate headers from data and to close the table
- Footnotes go below the table, referenced with superscript lowercase letters
Supplementary Material:
Frontiers calls it "Supplementary Material" (not Supporting Information or Data Supplement). It's submitted as separate files and published alongside the article with its own DOI. Supplementary Figures use the prefix "Supplementary Figure" (spelled out, not abbreviated). There are no strict limits on supplementary content.
Reference Format: Frontiers (Author-Year) Style
Frontiers in Plant Science uses an author-year citation format similar to Harvard style but with Frontiers-specific details.
In-text citation rules:
- Single author: (Smith, 2025)
- Two authors: (Smith and Jones, 2025)
- Three or more authors: (Smith et al., 2025)
- Multiple citations: (Smith, 2024; Jones et al., 2025) ordered chronologically
- Direct quote or specific page: (Smith, 2025, p. 42)
Reference list formatting:
- Alphabetized by first author's last name
- All authors listed for papers with up to and including 13 authors
- For 14+ authors, list the first 13 followed by "et al."
- Journal names written in full (not abbreviated)
- DOIs required for all entries that have them
Example journal article:
Smith, J. A., Jones, B. C., and Williams, D. E. (2026). Root architecture remodeling under phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 17:1234567. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1234567
Example book chapter:
Brown, L. M. (2025). "Photosynthetic regulation in C4 crops," in Advances in Plant Physiology, eds. R. K. Green and S. T. White (Academic Press), 145-178.
Note a few Frontiers-specific details: the reference list spells out journal names in full, the DOI is required, and the format for edited book chapters puts the chapter title in quotes. If you're using a reference manager, Zotero and Mendeley both have a Frontiers-specific output style. Make sure you're using the current version.
LaTeX vs. Word
Both LaTeX and Word are fully supported, and there's no preference from the journal's perspective.
Word submissions:
- Use the Frontiers Word template
- Times New Roman, 12-point, single-spaced (the template handles this)
- Don't manually format headings; use the built-in styles
- Embed figures in the manuscript at the appropriate locations
- Also upload each figure as a separate high-resolution file
LaTeX submissions:
- Use the Frontiers LaTeX template (frontiersSCIENS.cls)
- The template includes example files showing correct section usage
- BibTeX is supported with the frontiersinSCIENS_ENG_HUMS.bst style file
- Submit compiled PDF plus all source files
- Upload figures separately as TIFF or EPS at 300+ DPI
For plant science manuscripts, Word is more commonly used than LaTeX, but if your paper includes complex phylogenetic notation, mathematical models, or extensive equations, LaTeX is the better tool.
Frontiers in Plant Science-Specific Formatting Quirks
1. Collaborative review means your manuscript is seen by reviewers with their names attached. Frontiers uses an open review model where reviewers and authors interact directly. This doesn't change formatting requirements, but it does mean your manuscript needs to be polished at submission because reviewers won't be anonymous.
2. Section-specific requirements vary. Frontiers in Plant Science has over 30 specialty sections (Plant Abiotic Stress, Plant Biotechnology, Crop Biology, etc.). Some sections have additional requirements, such as data deposition mandates or specific figure expectations. Check the section page before submitting.
3. Author contributions are mandatory. You must include an Author Contributions section listing each author's specific role. Generic statements like "All authors contributed equally" are not accepted. Use the CRediT taxonomy: "JA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. BK: Data curation, Formal analysis." This is enforced during production.
4. Data Availability Statement required. Every article must include a Data Availability Statement. For sequencing data, that means GEO, SRA, or DDBJ accession numbers. For proteomics, PRIDE accession numbers. Generic statements like "data available upon request" are discouraged and may be rejected.
5. Ethics declarations and plant material sourcing. Studies involving genetically modified organisms, human subjects, or animal experiments require ethics statements. For field studies involving wild plant species, you need to confirm that collection complied with local regulations and that specimens were identified by a qualified botanist.
6. The 12,000-word limit includes figure legends. This catches a lot of authors. If you have 15 figures with detailed legends, those words eat into your total. Plan accordingly.
Manuscript Structure for Original Research
A Frontiers in Plant Science Original Research article follows this structure:
- Title (no abbreviations unless standard)
- Author names and affiliations
- Abstract (350 words max, unstructured)
- Keywords (5-8 keywords, at least one from the Frontiers keyword list)
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion (optional separate section)
- Data Availability Statement
- Ethics Statement (if applicable)
- Author Contributions
- Funding
- Acknowledgments
- Conflict of Interest
- References
- Supplementary Material
The Introduction should provide enough context for a broad plant science audience, not just specialists in your subfield. Frontiers is a broad-scope journal, and your paper will be read by researchers outside your immediate area.
Results and Discussion can be combined or kept separate. Both approaches are standard in the journal. If you combine them, clearly label the section "Results and Discussion."
Article Processing Charges
As a fully open-access journal, Frontiers in Plant Science charges an article processing charge (APC) upon acceptance. The current fee for an Original Research article is approximately $2,490 USD. Brief Research Reports cost less (roughly $1,350). Fee waivers and institutional discounts are available.
The APC is charged after peer review and acceptance, not at submission. You won't need to pay anything to submit your manuscript for review.
Common Formatting Mistakes
These errors cause the most delays at Frontiers in Plant Science:
- Exceeding the word limit (remember, figure legends count toward the total)
- Using a non-Frontiers reference style (especially common when reformatting from another journal)
- Missing the Data Availability Statement
- Generic Author Contributions that don't specify individual roles
- Figures below 300 DPI resolution
- Keywords not matching the Frontiers keyword list
- Forgetting to include DOIs in references
Internal Links and Resources
For authors considering other open-access venues, see our Nature formatting requirements guide for a very different formatting system. If you're working in a related field, our Science formatting requirements page covers another common submission target.
For the official author instructions, visit the Frontiers in Plant Science author guidelines.
Get Your Formatting Right Before You Submit
Frontiers in Plant Science's formatting system is straightforward compared to journals like Cell Press or Nature, but the details still matter. The word limit that includes figure legends, the mandatory Data Availability Statement, author contributions in CRediT format, and the Frontiers-specific reference style are all checked during editorial screening. Missing any of them means your submission gets returned for corrections before it even reaches a reviewer.
If you want to verify your manuscript meets Frontiers in Plant Science's specific requirements before submission, try Manusights' free AI manuscript scan. It checks formatting, structure, and reference style against journal-specific standards so you can fix problems before editors see them.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.