Gastroenterology SJR and Scopus Metrics: What They Actually Mean
Gastroenterology still has flagship GI metrics, but the real submission question is whether your paper is broad and consequential enough for that audience.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Gastroenterology at a glance
Key metrics to place the journal before deciding whether it fits your manuscript and career goals.
What makes this journal worth targeting
- IF 25.1 puts Gastroenterology in a visible tier — citations from papers here carry real weight.
- Scope specificity matters more than impact factor for most manuscript decisions.
- Acceptance rate of ~~12% means fit determines most outcomes.
When to look elsewhere
- When your paper sits at the edge of the journal's stated scope — borderline fit rarely improves after submission.
- If timeline matters: Gastroenterology takes ~25 days median. A faster-turnaround journal may suit a grant or job deadline better.
- If open access is required by your funder, verify the journal's OA agreements before submitting.
Quick answer: Gastroenterology still has flagship-level Scopus authority in digestive disease publishing. Current Scopus-based sources place it at SJR 7.195, impact score 7.19, global rank 153, and h-index 482 in 2024. As the flagship AGA journal, it still functions as one of the core rooms where broad GI papers get compared against the field's strongest work. The hard submission question is whether the manuscript has enough breadth, mechanistic depth, and translational consequence for this audience.
Direct answer
If your question is whether Gastroenterology still behaves like a GI flagship in the Scopus system, the answer is yes.
Metric | Current value | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
SJR | 7.195 | prestige-weighted influence remains elite for GI publishing |
Impact Score | 7.19 | citation density remains strong in current Scopus data |
Global rank | 153 | the journal sits comfortably inside the top global tier |
h-index | 482 | the archive has deep long-run field influence |
Best quartile | Q1 | the title remains top-tier in gastroenterology and hepatology |
Coverage history | 1945-2025 | this is durable field authority |
That profile matters because Gastroenterology is still one of the rooms that defines what flagship GI publishing looks like, not just one that benefits from society branding.
Overview
The useful summary is that Gastroenterology remains elite, but its current 2024 profile is flatter than some of its recent best years. That gives authors a realistic baseline rather than an inflated one.
What changed in 2024
The 2024 picture is mildly softer than 2023.
- SJR moved down from 7.362 in 2023 to 7.195 in 2024
- impact score moved down from 7.65 to 7.19
- global rank moved from 147 to 153
That is a small cooldown, not a strategic shift. For authors, it means the journal remains a flagship GI room, but current numbers should be read as stable high-end performance rather than peak-era exaggeration.
Ten-year SJR and Scopus trend
Year | SJR | Impact Score | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 7.195 | 7.19 | 153 |
2023 | 7.362 | 7.65 | 147 |
2022 | 7.645 | 10.10 | 123 |
2021 | 7.689 | 11.69 | 116 |
2020 | 7.828 | 7.44 | 131 |
2019 | 6.850 | 6.97 | 169 |
2018 | 7.384 | 6.97 | 144 |
2017 | 7.958 | 7.25 | 126 |
2016 | 6.925 | 7.46 | 167 |
2015 | 7.472 | 7.52 | 135 |
2014 | 6.648 | 7.22 | 174 |
The trend is steady rather than dramatic. Gastroenterology has been strong for the full decade, with SJR consistently in the high-six to high-seven range. That is what durable flagship status looks like in a specialist clinical-science field.
What the trend means in practice
For authors, the trend usually means:
- the journal still offers major visibility across GI and hepatology
- the archive remains strong enough that weak fit gets exposed quickly
- the bar is not about hype, but about genuine field-wide consequence
- papers that are too narrow for a flagship audience still need a different lane
That is why the journal can be unforgiving with strong but localized papers. Its long-run strength comes from publishing work that matters across the digestive-disease field.
A quick Gastroenterology fit benchmark
If the paper looks like this | Gastroenterology fit |
|---|---|
broad GI or hepatology story with clear mechanistic or clinical consequence | strong |
work that changes how many GI researchers or clinicians think about a problem | strong |
narrow disease-corner paper with limited field spillover | weak |
technically sound but mainly descriptive study without a stronger take-home change | weak |
This benchmark is usually more useful than the raw SJR because the journal's flagship status is really about breadth and consequence, not just citation density.
How Gastroenterology compares with realistic neighbors
Journal | 2024 SJR | What the metric profile usually signals |
|---|---|---|
Gut | 8.874 | strongest prestige-weighted GI specialist room in the current comparison set |
Gastroenterology | 7.195 | flagship AGA journal with broad GI consequence expectations |
Hepatology | 5.557 | premier liver-focused flagship with narrower audience logic |
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 11.205 | elite field journal outside GI, useful only as a prestige-distance reference |
This comparison helps because many borderline papers are really deciding between Gastroenterology, Gut, and a narrower specialty journal. The metrics confirm Gastroenterology belongs in that flagship conversation.
What editors are really screening for
The journal's scope and archive point to a consistent standard. Even the current journal description still organizes original research around broad clinical and basic sections across the alimentary tract and liver, pancreas, and biliary disease. That is a strong signal that the room is built for field-defining GI work, not only one narrow subspecialty lane.
In practice, editors are screening for:
- broad GI consequence, not only a narrow disease or pathway result
- translational importance that is easy to explain to the field
- enough mechanism or clinical depth to survive serious review
- work that matters across digestive-disease medicine rather than only one corner
That is why the profile stays so strong. The journal is not publishing only descriptive GI work. It is publishing papers that reshape how the field thinks or acts.
In Our Pre-Submission Review Work on Gastroenterology Metric Questions
In our pre-submission review work on Gastroenterology metric questions, three mistakes recur.
The GI-but-not-flagship mistake. Authors often see a strong GI paper and assume that is enough. At this journal, field breadth still matters.
The translational-gap mistake. Another common miss is mechanistic work without enough clinical or broader GI consequence to justify the room.
The prestige-substitution mistake. We also see authors use the journal's metrics as a reason to try it without asking whether the story really speaks to the full GI audience. The SJR confirms authority. It does not create fit.
That is the real use of the number. It explains why the journal can keep a flagship profile while rejecting many solid specialist papers.
What these metrics mean for authors
For authors, the current profile says:
- publication here still carries major signal across digestive-disease medicine
- the archive is strong enough that incomplete stories stand out quickly
- broad GI consequence matters more than narrow excellence
- if the manuscript truly belongs here, the visibility payoff is real
The h-index of 482 matters because it reflects a very deep archive of frequently reused GI papers. Entering that archive is valuable, but only if the manuscript is truly in the right tier.
Submit If / Think Twice If
Submit if:
- the paper has clear field-wide GI relevance
- the translational or mechanistic consequence is easy to defend
- the manuscript can speak to both specialists and broader digestive-disease readers
- narrower journals feel too restrictive for the real scope of the story
Think twice if:
- the paper is strong but mainly important inside one subfield niche
- the translational bridge still feels incomplete
- the story is better framed as hepatology-only or method-specific work
- the main reason for trying the journal is prestige rather than audience fit
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
What should drive the decision after the metrics check
The better question is whether the manuscript is truly a Gastroenterology paper in its current form.
That is why the next useful reads are:
- Gastroenterology acceptance rate
- Gastroenterology review time
- Is Gastroenterology indexed in PubMed?
- Gastroenterology journal profile
If the manuscript has broad GI relevance and enough consequence, the upside is real. If it is narrower than that, the metric profile is mostly a warning to choose more honestly. A Gastroenterology submission framing check is the fastest way to pressure-test that before submission.
Practical verdict
Gastroenterology still has elite Scopus metrics and remains a genuine flagship GI target. The 2024 profile is a little softer than 2021-2023, but not in a way that changes the editorial logic.
For authors, the metric question is already settled. The real decision is whether the manuscript is broad enough for the room.
- Is Gastroenterology indexed in PubMed?, Manusights.
Frequently asked questions
Gastroenterology's 2024 SJR is 7.195 on current Scopus-based metric aggregators, which keeps it among the strongest journals in digestive disease research.
Current Scopus-based sources place Gastroenterology's 2024 impact score at 7.19, with a global rank of 153 and h-index of 482.
Because it remains a flagship journal for broad GI work that combines mechanism, translational consequence, and clinically legible importance.
No. The key question is whether the manuscript has enough breadth and field consequence for a flagship GI journal.
Sources
- 1. Gastroenterology metrics page, Resurchify.
- 2. Gastroenterology guide for authors, Elsevier and AGA.
- 3. Gastroenterology journal homepage, Elsevier and AGA.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Gastroenterology Submission Guide: What Editors Screen Before Review
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Gastroenterology
- Is Gastroenterology a Good Journal? Impact, Scope, and Fit
- Gastroenterology vs Hepatology
- Pre-Submission Review for Gastroenterology Papers
- Gastroenterology Impact Factor 2026: 25.1, Q1, Rank 5/147
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.