What is the impact factor of Gastroenterology?

Gastroenterology has an impact factor of 25.1 (2024). This places it among the top-tier journals in its field with Gastroenterology publishes mechanistic research that advances understanding of GI disease from bench to bedside.

How long does Gastroenterology take to review?

Gastroenterology typically takes ~25 days. The full review process involves 5 main stages: presubmission inquiry (optional), full submission, and peer review.

Is Gastroenterology peer reviewed?

Yes, Gastroenterology is fully peer reviewed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review by 2-3 expert reviewers in GI biology/medicine. Focus on mechanistic rigor and clinical relevance..

All Journal Guides

Journal Guide

Gastroenterology Impact Factor 25.1: Publishing Guide

Q: What is the acceptance rate of Gastroenterology?

Gastroenterology has an acceptance rate of ~12%. A common reason for rejection is submitting purely descriptive studies. Showing that protein X is upregulated in IBD without mechanistic insight doesn't meet the bar. Gastroenterology wants to know WHY and HOW.

Q: What does Gastroenterology look for in submissions?

Mechanistic depth with clinical relevance: Don't just show that X affects the gut. Show exactly how it works and why that mechanism matters for human disease. Connect the dots from molecules to patients.

Q: What should I know before submitting to Gastroenterology?

Think of Gut as your main competitor. Both journals cover high-impact GI research. If Gut recently published something related, you need to clearly differentiate your contribution. Editors read both journals.

AGA's flagship journal: where mechanistic GI research meets clinical translation

25.1

Impact Factor (2024)

~12%

Acceptance Rate

~25 days

Time to First Decision

What Gastroenterology Publishes

Gastroenterology publishes mechanistic research that advances understanding of GI disease from bench to bedside. This is THE GI journal - if you work on the digestive system, this is where you want your best work. They want translational studies that connect basic science discoveries to clinical GI problems.

Mechanistic studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology at molecular, cellular, and organ levels
Translational research connecting basic discoveries to human GI disease
Novel therapeutic approaches with strong preclinical validation
Large clinical studies that define new standards of care in gastroenterology
Resource papers providing new tools, models, or datasets for GI research

Editor Insight

“Gastroenterology sits at the intersection of basic science and clinical medicine. We want mechanistic studies that will change how gastroenterologists think about disease. If your work only matters to basic scientists or only to clinicians, consider a more specialized venue.”

What Gastroenterology Editors Look For

Mechanistic depth with clinical relevance

Don't just show that X affects the gut. Show exactly how it works and why that mechanism matters for human disease. Connect the dots from molecules to patients.

Strong preclinical validation

Multiple model systems, human tissue validation, and clear therapeutic implications. If you've only worked in one mouse strain or one cell line, you're not ready.

Translational potential

Every mechanistic study should point toward therapeutic opportunities. What's the druggable target? What's the biomarker? How does this change patient care?

Complete experimental stories

Gastroenterology wants thorough studies that address obvious follow-up questions. If reviewers will ask 'did you check X?', you should have already checked X.

High-quality human data

Mouse work is fine, but validation in human samples, human organoids, or clinical cohorts dramatically strengthens your story.

Innovation in methodology

New techniques, new models, new ways of approaching old problems. The GI field values technical innovation that enables new discoveries.

Why Papers Get Rejected

These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Gastroenterology's editorial review:

Submitting purely descriptive studies

Showing that protein X is upregulated in IBD without mechanistic insight doesn't meet the bar. Gastroenterology wants to know WHY and HOW.

Single-model validation

If your conclusion comes from one mouse model or one cell type, reviewers will question generalizability. Multiple systems strengthen claims.

Missing clinical connection

Beautiful mechanistic work that doesn't connect to human disease or therapeutic opportunities feels incomplete. Make the clinical relevance explicit.

Weak experimental controls

GI research often involves complex models and interventions. Every experiment needs proper controls, and every conclusion needs support from orthogonal approaches.

Overselling early findings

Claiming therapeutic potential based on preliminary data backfires. Be honest about what you've proven and what still needs validation.

Ignoring Gut as a competitor

Gastroenterology and Gut occupy similar spaces. Know what's been published in Gut recently and articulate why your work advances the field.

Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?

The quick diagnostic reads your full manuscript against Gastroenterology's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.

Run Free Readiness Scan →

Insider Tips from Gastroenterology Authors

Think of Gut as your main competitor

Both journals cover high-impact GI research. If Gut recently published something related, you need to clearly differentiate your contribution. Editors read both journals.

Human organoid data is increasingly valued

Patient-derived organoids that recapitulate your mouse findings add significant weight. This technology is transforming GI research and Gastroenterology recognizes it.

AGA connections matter but aren't required

This is the official AGA journal, so work presented at DDW or with AGA grant support may get extra attention, but quality trumps politics.

IBD and NAFLD/NASH are hot topics

These are areas of intense clinical need with active drug development. Mechanistic insights into these conditions are particularly valued.

Microbiome studies need exceptional rigor

The field is saturated with correlative microbiome papers. If you're studying gut microbes, you need mechanistic insight and functional validation.

Clinical cohort integration strengthens basic studies

If you can validate your mouse findings in patient samples or existing clinical cohorts, do it. This elevates mechanistic work to translational significance.

Methods innovation opens doors

New imaging techniques, new model systems, new analytical approaches: these can carry papers even if the biological insights are incremental.

Consider the journal's educational mission

Gastroenterology serves practicing gastroenterologists too. If your work has immediate clinical implications, emphasize this in your cover letter.

The Gastroenterology Submission Process

Presubmission inquiry (optional)

Response within 1-2 weeks

Brief pitch with key findings and significance. Useful for gauging fit, especially for non-traditional approaches or methods papers.

Full submission

Initial decision ~25 days

Complete manuscript with emphasis on mechanistic insights and translational relevance. Include clear figures showing key mechanisms.

Editorial assessment

~2 weeks

Editors evaluate mechanistic depth, translational potential, and fit for general GI audience. Desk rejection ~60%.

Peer review

3-4 weeks

2-3 expert reviewers in GI biology/medicine. Focus on mechanistic rigor and clinical relevance.

Revision

2-4 months typical

Expect substantial revision requests. Additional experiments common, especially for validation in alternative models.

Gastroenterology by the Numbers

2024 Impact Factor(Clarivate JCR)	25.7
Submissions per year	~3,500
Acceptance rate	~12%
Desk rejection rate	~60%
Time to first decision	25 days median
Monthly publication	12 issues/year
AGA membership	16,000+ gastroenterologists

Before you submit

Gastroenterology accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.

The pre-submission diagnostic runs a live literature search, scores your manuscript section by section, and gives you a prioritized fix list calibrated to Gastroenterology. ~30 minutes.

Run Free Readiness Scan See a sample report

Article Types

Original Research

No strict limit; typically 6-8 figures

Full mechanistic studies with translational implications

Brief Report

Shorter format with fewer figures

Focused findings of exceptional importance

Review

By invitation or proposal

In-depth reviews of important GI topics

Clinical Research

Variable depending on scope

Patient-centered studies with mechanistic insights

Landmark Gastroenterology Papers

Papers that defined fields and changed science:

Discovery of Helicobacter pylori in gastric ulcers (Warren & Marshall, 1984, Nobel Prize 2005)
Identification of HFE gene mutations in hereditary hemochromatosis (Feder et al., 1996)
First description of celiac disease intestinal pathology (Paulley, 1954)
Discovery of ghrelin as gastric hunger hormone (Kojima et al., 1999)
Characterization of enteroendocrine cell types and GLP-1 regulation (Drucker, 2006)

Preparing a Gastroenterology Submission?

Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Gastroenterology and know exactly what editors look for.

Run Free Readiness Scan

Need expert depth? Human review from $1,000

NDA-protected

Confidential

Primary Fields

GastroenterologyHepatologyGI PhysiologyIBDNAFLD/NASHGI CancerMicrobiomeGI Motility

Related Journal Guides

All journal guides

All articles

Ready to submit to Gastroenterology?

A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Gastroenterology editors look for.

Need field-expert depth? Human review from $1,000