Gut SJR and Scopus Metrics: What They Actually Mean
Gut still has elite GI metrics, but the useful submission question is whether the paper is broad and consequential enough for one of the field's hardest rooms.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Gut at a glance
Key metrics to place the journal before deciding whether it fits your manuscript and career goals.
What makes this journal worth targeting
- IF 25.8 puts Gut in a visible tier — citations from papers here carry real weight.
- Scope specificity matters more than impact factor for most manuscript decisions.
- Acceptance rate of ~~12% means fit determines most outcomes.
When to look elsewhere
- When your paper sits at the edge of the journal's stated scope — borderline fit rarely improves after submission.
- If timeline matters: Gut takes ~24 days. A faster-turnaround journal may suit a grant or job deadline better.
- If open access is required by your funder, verify the journal's OA agreements before submitting.
Quick answer: Gut still has elite Scopus metrics in gastroenterology. Current sources place it at SJR 8.874, impact score 14.49, global rank 103, and h-index 364 in 2024. BMJ's current journal pages still present Gut as a flagship title with companion journals serving narrower roles, which fits what the numbers show: this is a top-room specialist journal, not just a respected society title. The hard submission question is whether the manuscript has enough breadth, consequence, and translational force for one of GI's toughest editorial rooms.
Direct answer
If your question is whether Gut still sits in the top specialist tier of digestive-disease publishing, the answer is yes.
Metric | Current value | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
SJR | 8.874 | prestige-weighted influence remains elite in GI |
Impact Score | 14.49 | paper-level citation performance is very strong |
Global rank | 103 | the journal sits deep in the upper global tier |
h-index | 364 | the archive has major long-run field influence |
Best quartile | Q1 | the journal remains top-tier in gastroenterology |
2024 JCR context | 25.8 | the Web of Science picture tells the same flagship story |
That profile matters because Gut is still one of the few specialist journals in GI where accepted papers are expected to matter well beyond a narrow disease corner.
Overview
The useful summary is that Gut remains elite and the 2024 profile is actually stronger on SJR than 2023, even though the impact score eased a bit. That is the profile of a stable flagship, not a journal sliding out of the top layer.
What changed in 2024
The 2024 picture is mixed, but still very strong.
- SJR moved up from 8.052 in 2023 to 8.874 in 2024
- impact score moved down from 15.00 to 14.49
- global rank improved from 117 to 103
That combination matters. The prestige-weighted score improved, even while short-window citation density cooled slightly. For authors, that usually means the journal's top-end authority remains intact.
Ten-year SJR and Scopus trend
Year | SJR | Impact Score | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8.874 | 14.49 | 103 |
2023 | 8.052 | 15.00 | 117 |
2022 | 8.588 | 15.85 | 99 |
2021 | 7.885 | 17.35 | 112 |
2020 | 8.413 | 13.05 | 112 |
2019 | 7.763 | 12.53 | 121 |
2018 | 7.085 | 11.39 | 158 |
2017 | 7.440 | 10.32 | 147 |
2016 | 7.074 | 10.13 | 162 |
2015 | 6.809 | 10.69 | 166 |
2014 | 6.104 | 10.00 | 205 |
The trend matters because it shows a long strengthening over the decade. Gut is not just holding onto old prestige. It has become more central to GI's prestige-weighted citation network over time.
What the trend means in practice
For authors, the trend usually means:
- the journal still carries exceptional GI visibility
- accepted papers are expected to matter across digestive-disease medicine, not just within a niche
- the room is hard because the field reads it as a flagship
- many strong but narrow papers still belong somewhere else
That last point is the real one. The metrics are strong because the journal publishes work that travels across the field, not because it is friendly to every high-quality GI paper.
A quick Gut fit benchmark
If the paper looks like this | Gut fit |
|---|---|
broad GI or hepatology consequence with translational or practice relevance | strong |
mechanism or clinical study with clear field-wide implications | strong |
narrow subspecialty paper with limited consequences outside one lane | weak |
descriptive work without a sharper change in understanding or management | weak |
This benchmark is more useful than the raw SJR because Gut is a room for consequential GI publishing, not just for technically competent digestive-disease papers.
How Gut compares with realistic neighbors
Journal | 2024 SJR | What the metric profile usually signals |
|---|---|---|
Gut | 8.874 | top-tier GI flagship with unusually strong prestige concentration |
Gastroenterology | 7.195 | flagship AGA journal with broad GI authority |
Hepatology | 5.557 | liver flagship with narrower audience logic |
JCI | 3.911 | elite translational medicine venue outside pure GI journal logic |
This comparison helps because the real submission decision is usually among Gut, Gastroenterology, and a narrower specialty target. The metrics confirm Gut belongs in the very top layer of that decision set.
What editors are really screening for
BMJ's current Gut pages still frame the title as the leading broad GI journal within a family where companion journals absorb more basic-science-only or sound-science clinical work.
That usually means editors are screening for:
- broad digestive-disease consequence
- translational or clinical importance that can be defended quickly
- a story with enough weight to justify the flagship room
- work that will matter across GI, not only within one narrow pocket
That is why the metrics stay so high. The journal is selective about consequence, not just about formal quality.
In Our Pre-Submission Review Work on Gut Metric Questions
In our pre-submission review work on Gut metric questions, three mistakes recur.
The top-GI-but-still-local mistake. Authors often have a very strong paper that still matters mainly inside one disease or method lane. That is not always a Gut paper.
The translation-gap mistake. Another common miss is strong mechanism with insufficient broader consequence or practice relevance for the room.
The prestige-substitution mistake. We also see teams use the elite metric profile as a reason to try the journal without pressure-testing audience fit. The SJR confirms the upside. It does not create the breadth.
That is the practical meaning of the number. Gut stays elite because it rejects many strong GI papers that are still not broad enough.
What these metrics mean for authors
For authors, the current profile says:
- publication here still carries rare GI prestige
- the archive is deep enough that comparison pressure is intense
- broad consequence matters more than narrow excellence
- the payoff is real, but only when the paper genuinely belongs in the room
The h-index of 364 matters because it reflects a heavily reused archive of high-consequence digestive-disease papers. Entering that archive is valuable, but only if the manuscript is truly in range.
Submit If / Think Twice If
Submit if:
- the paper has field-wide GI or hepatology consequence
- the translational or clinical relevance is easy to defend
- the story is broader than one narrow disease corner
- competing specialist journals feel too narrow for the real scope of the work
Think twice if:
- the paper is strong but mainly subspecialty
- the translational bridge still feels incomplete
- the main reason for trying the journal is status rather than fit
- the work depends on a lot of niche context before it feels important
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
What should drive the decision after the metrics check
The better question is whether the manuscript is truly a Gut paper in its current form.
That is why the next useful reads are:
If the manuscript has enough breadth and consequence, the upside is real. If it is narrower than that, the metric profile is mostly a warning to choose more honestly. A Gut submission framing check is the fastest way to pressure-test that before submission.
Practical verdict
Gut still has elite Scopus metrics and remains one of the clearest top-room journals in digestive-disease publishing. The 2024 profile confirms that.
For authors, the metric question is already answered. The live question is whether the paper is broad enough for the room.
Frequently asked questions
Gut's 2024 SJR is 8.874 on current Scopus-based sources, which keeps it among the very top gastroenterology journals in the world.
Current Scopus-based sources place Gut's 2024 impact score at 14.49, with a global rank of 103 and h-index of 364.
Because it still functions as one of the field's flagship journals for broad, consequential digestive-disease research with real translational or practice impact.
No. The real question is whether the manuscript has enough breadth, consequence, and editorial sharpness for one of GI's hardest specialist rooms.
Sources
- 1. Gut metrics page, Resurchify.
- 2. Gut about page, BMJ.
- 3. Gut homepage, BMJ.
- 4. British Society of Gastroenterology journal metrics note, BSG.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Gut Submission Guide: Scope, Format & Tips (2026)
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Gut
- Is Gut a Good Journal? Impact Factor, Scope, and Decision Guide
- Gut Impact Factor 2026: 25.8, Q1, Rank 4/147
- Gut Submission Process: What Happens After You Upload (2026)
- Rejected from Gut? The 7 Best Journals to Submit Next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.