Journal of Materials Chemistry C Impact Factor
Journal of Materials Chemistry C has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 5.1. Verify RSC's current metric, eISSN, scope, and source boundary.
Journal evaluation
Want the full journal picture?
See scope, selectivity, submission context, and what editors actually want before you decide whether the journal is realistic.
Quick answer: The Journal of Materials Chemistry C impact factor is a 2025 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of 5.1. The Royal Society of Chemistry’s current journal page also lists a median 17 days to first decision for all submissions, 31 days for peer-reviewed submissions, eISSN 2050-7534, and a hybrid publishing model. Cite 5.1 as the 2025 JIF released in 2026. It is not a claim about a 2026 citation year, a manuscript’s acceptance odds, or a guaranteed editorial timeline.
Last reviewed: July 14, 2026. Evidence basis: the current Royal Society of Chemistry journal page and Clarivate JCR method guidance.
What is the Journal of Materials Chemistry C impact factor at a glance?
Metric or identifier | Current value | Source boundary |
|---|---|---|
Journal Impact Factor | 5.1 (2025 JIF) | Current RSC journal page |
First decision time, all submissions | Median 17 days | Current RSC journal page; not a decision promise |
First decision time, peer reviewed | Median 31 days | Current RSC journal page; not a review promise |
Publishing model | Hybrid | Current RSC journal page |
eISSN | 2050-7534 | Current RSC journal page |
Publisher | Royal Society of Chemistry | Current RSC journal page |
The 5.1 JIF is a journal-level, two-year citation-window measure. The
decision-time medians describe different editorial aggregates. They should not
be combined into a quality score or used to predict acceptance, reviewer
outcome, publication timing, citations, or career value for one paper.
Is this the exact RSC journal record?
Journal of Materials Chemistry C is an RSC journal for materials with
applications in optical, magnetic, and electronic devices. It is not *Journal
of Materials Chemistry A*, which focuses on energy and sustainability, or
Journal of Materials Chemistry B, which focuses on biology and medicine.
The current RSC record lists eISSN 2050-7534.
Verify before citing | Match | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
Exact title | Journal of Materials Chemistry C | Separates the C title from the A and B journals |
Scope signal | Optical, magnetic, and electronic-device applications | Stops an application-family mismatch |
Identifier | eISSN 2050-7534 | Resolves directory and title collisions |
Metric year | 2025 | Identifies the JIF reporting period |
Source | Current RSC journal page | Anchors the lookup to the publisher display |
Impact factor trend verification guardrail
The checked primary record supports the 2025 JIF of 5.1, but it does not
provide a complete annual JIF series for an audited chart. This page therefore
does not calculate a year-over-year change, present a multi-year trend, or
forecast a future value. A visible historical number can be correct for a
different data year while still being wrong for a current lookup.
Metric data year | JIF supported by the checked primary record | What can be claimed |
|---|---|---|
2025 | 5.1 | Current RSC-displayed JIF only |
For a grant, promotion, institutional report, or formal ranking comparison,
verify the exact annual row in licensed Journal Citation Reports. The exact
public lookup is useful, but it does not establish whether the JIF rose, fell,
or predicts citations for an individual article.
Freshness check: current record versus cached metric
The named failure pattern for this query is cached-metric substitution.
Search results and older RSC records can retain 5.2, while the current RSC
journal page explicitly reports 5.1 (2025). The public lookup should use
the current page, preserve its metric year, and avoid presenting a prior
display as the latest JIF.
When records differ | Safer action | Why |
|---|---|---|
Current RSC record and an older cached result differ | Use the current RSC page for a current lookup | It states the exact title, year, and current displayed statistic |
A historic page shows another value | Treat it as historic unless its data year is confirmed | Prior values do not become current automatically |
A formal report needs rank or percentile | Check JCR directly | The RSC page is not a licensed JCR export |
A metric is attached to A, B, or C without full title | Match the title, scope, and eISSN | The title letter changes the journal and reader job |
This page does not claim that a publisher display replaces a licensed JCR
record. It gives a narrower public-lookup rule: match the exact title, metric
year, and primary source before reusing a number from a snippet or directory.
How should the RSC metrics and scope be read?
The JIF answers a citation-metric question. The 17-day and 31-day medians
describe prior editorial timing distributions. RSC presents the journal’s
scope separately because a materials result should be routed by intended
application, not by a citation number alone. A study with an energy or
sustainability application may belong with Journal of Materials Chemistry A;
a biology or medicine application may belong with Journal of Materials
Chemistry B.
Decision | Better evidence than a metric alone | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
Is this the intended journal? | Exact title, device-application scope, and eISSN | Stops A/B/C title substitution |
Does the paper fit? | Functional application, materials insight, and evidence | A citation average cannot decide scope |
Is the work ready? | Claims, controls, characterization, and limitations | Metrics cannot validate a manuscript |
Is a deadline feasible? | Current author guidance and actual deadline | A median is not publication time |
Is open access required? | Current RSC options and institutional agreement | Hybrid status does not decide funding eligibility |
What the 5.1 JIF does not establish
The JIF does not establish an acceptance probability for one author, a required
citation count, a guaranteed editorial decision, an article processing charge,
or a recommendation to submit. The decision-time medians are journal-level
aggregates. A manuscript can be screened faster or slower, reviewed, revised,
or declined for reasons the metric does not capture.
Clarivate describes the JIF as a journal-level ratio involving citations and
citable items across the relevant two-year window. It should not be used as a
proxy for the quality of one paper, researcher, or research group. Follow the
metric source and institutional policy required for formal evaluation.
What pre-submission reviews reveal about Journal of Materials Chemistry C submissions
Application family asserted but not demonstrated. The RSC scope
distinguishes C by optical, magnetic, and electronic-device applications. A
materials result should make the intended device or functional application
visible, rather than leaving it as a general characterization claim.
Performance claim without a credible comparison. A device-related result
needs a relevant comparator, test conditions, uncertainty or variation where
appropriate, and a limit on what the reported measurement transfers to. A
single best value does not by itself establish a practical advance.
Speed metric treated as a manuscript forecast. The reported 17-day and
31-day medians describe past journal outcomes. They do not show that a
submission will pass screening, receive external review, or reach a decision
by a particular date.
These are Manusights pre-submission checks derived from the RSC’s published
scope, not claims about confidential editorial practice. [Run a Journal of
Materials Chemistry C submission readiness check](/ai-review?target_journal=Journal%20of%20Materials%20Chemistry%20C&source_blog=journal-of-materials-chemistry-c-impact-factor&primary_concern=journal_fit)
before using the metric to justify a venue decision.
Why this exact-record page exists
This page was created by the Manusights editorial team after a current
publisher-record check. This page helps when the decision is whether a visible
number is the current metric for the C journal, rather than a cached value or
a metric belonging to the A or B title.
It owns only the Journal of Materials Chemistry C impact-factor lookup. It
does not own journal selection, submission mechanics, fees, or the neighboring
A and B journals. That separation keeps the first screen metric-first and
avoids competing with a different reader job.
For formal citation, retain the full title, metric name, year, and source:
"Journal of Materials Chemistry C’s 2025 Journal Impact Factor is 5.1,
according to the Royal Society of Chemistry."
What should authors verify before citing the metric?
- Match Journal of Materials Chemistry C and eISSN 2050-7534.
- Describe 5.1 as a 2025 JIF, not a 2026 citation-year value.
- Prefer the current RSC record over an older cached 5.2 display.
- Do not substitute decision-time medians for the JIF.
- Verify formal ranks, percentiles, historical changes, and funding decisions in JCR and current RSC guidance.
For adjacent reading, see the Journal of Materials Chemistry A record, Journal of Materials Chemistry C submission guide, and Journal of Applied Physics journal record, then use an interdisciplinary manuscript readiness check. These are separate resources and do not replace this exact metric lookup.
Submit If
- You need a current, exact-title RSC metric lookup.
- You need to distinguish the 2025 JIF from RSC’s timing aggregates.
- You need a defensible current source boundary before citing the number.
Think Twice If
- A cached result presents 5.2 as the current metric.
- The JIF is being used to forecast a paper’s acceptance, review time, or citations.
- A formal rank, historic trend, fee, or institutional policy is needed but not established by the source used here.
Frequently asked questions
Journal of Materials Chemistry C has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 5.1 on the current Royal Society of Chemistry journal page. Cite it as a 2025 JIF released in 2026, not as a 2026 citation-year value.
Older RSC and cached journal records can retain a prior value. For the current public lookup, use the RSC journal page that explicitly reports 5.1 for 2025, and verify a formal record in Journal Citation Reports when needed.
The RSC journal page lists eISSN 2050-7534. Match the exact title and eISSN before citing the metric.
RSC reports a 17-day first decision time for all submissions and 31 days for peer-reviewed submissions. These are past journal aggregates, not a promise for an individual manuscript.
No. The journal focuses on materials for optical, magnetic, and electronic devices. Fit depends on the intended application, materials insight, evidence, and scope, not the JIF alone.
Sources
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Materials Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can Use
- Materials Submission Guide: What Editors Screen Before Review
- Materials Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Materials
- Is Your Paper Ready for Materials (MDPI)? A Realistic Pre-Submission Checklist
- Energy Storage Materials Under Review: What the Status Means