Physical Review B Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Physical Review B formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Physical Review B (PRB) doesn't impose a word limit on Regular Articles, but Rapid Communications (Letters) are capped at 4 published pages. REVTeX/LaTeX is the strongly preferred submission format, and most PRB authors use it exclusively. The journal uses the APS numbered reference style (handled automatically by REVTeX and BibTeX), and Supplemental Material is hosted through APS's own system. PRB is the flagship condensed matter physics journal, and its formatting conventions reflect decades of physics publishing tradition.
Word and page limits by article type
PRB measures articles in published pages rather than word counts, and Regular Articles have no formal page limit. This is typical of APS journals, which tend to let the physics dictate the length.
Article Type | Page/Word Limit | Abstract | Figures | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Regular Article | No limit (8-15 pages typical) | ~500 words, unstructured | No formal limit | No formal cap |
Letter (formerly Rapid Communication) | 4 published pages max | ~150 words, unstructured | Typically 3-4 | Typically 20-30 |
Brief Report | 4 published pages max | ~150 words, unstructured | Typically 2-3 | Typically 15-25 |
Comment | 1-2 pages | Brief abstract | Typically 1-2 | Typically 5-10 |
Reply | 1-2 pages | Brief abstract | Typically 1-2 | Typically 5-10 |
The absence of a word limit for Regular Articles is genuine. APS editors won't reject a paper purely for length. Published PRB Regular Articles range from 5 pages (concise experimental reports) to 25+ pages (detailed theoretical or computational studies). That said, reviewers will complain about unnecessarily long papers, and editors may ask you to trim.
Letters (the current name for what were previously called Rapid Communications) have a strict 4-page limit. This is measured on the final typeset output, not on your manuscript pages. In REVTeX format with the reprint option, 4 published pages translates to roughly 3,500-4,000 words plus 3 figures. The Letter format is for results of particular urgency or significance that warrant accelerated publication.
A practical tip: use \documentclass[aps,prb,reprint]{revtex4-2} to get an accurate estimate of your published page count. The preprint option (double-spaced, single-column) will make your manuscript look much longer than the final output.
Abstract requirements
PRB's abstract conventions are straightforward, reflecting physics publishing norms.
- Word limit: No strict limit, but approximately 500 words maximum for Regular Articles
- Structure: Unstructured (single paragraph)
- Citations: Not allowed in the abstract (with rare exceptions for PACS/subject codes)
- Math: Equations in the abstract are acceptable and common in PRB
The abstract should state the problem, summarize the approach, and present the main results. In condensed matter physics, abstracts often include specific numerical results ("We find a transition temperature of 42 K" or "The band gap narrows by 0.3 eV under 5% strain").
For Letters, the abstract should be shorter (approximately 150 words) and focus on the single main result that justifies rapid publication.
PACS numbers and subject areas: PRB used to require PACS (Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme) numbers. This system has been replaced by a subject area classification selected during submission. You don't need to include PACS numbers in the manuscript itself.
Figure and table specifications
PRB has relatively flexible figure requirements compared to Elsevier or Wiley journals. The physics community has long-established conventions for figure quality, and PRB follows them.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Resolution | 600 dpi for line art, 300 dpi for photos |
File formats | EPS (preferred), PDF, PNG, JPEG |
Color mode | RGB for online |
Single column width | 8.6 cm (3.4 inches) |
Double column width | 17.8 cm (7.0 inches) |
Maximum height | 23.7 cm (9.33 inches) |
Font in figures | Should match body text size (10-12 pt recommended) |
Color (online) | Free |
Color (print) | Fee unless grayscale print requested |
EPS is the preferred figure format. This is a legacy of the physics community's long relationship with LaTeX and PostScript. While PNG and JPEG are accepted, EPS files integrate most cleanly with REVTeX and produce the best output. If you're generating figures from matplotlib, gnuplot, or similar tools, export directly to EPS or PDF.
Color policy: PRB publishes color figures free of charge online. For the print edition, there's a per-figure color charge. Most authors choose "color online, grayscale in print" to avoid the fee. If you go this route, make sure your figures are interpretable in grayscale. Use different line styles (solid, dashed, dotted) in addition to colors, and avoid relying solely on color to distinguish data series.
Table formatting:
- Use LaTeX
tabularortableenvironments - Every column needs a header
- Use
\hlinesparingly (top, below header, bottom) - Units in column headers, not in individual cells
- Notes below tables using
\footnoteor manual superscripts
Reference format
PRB uses the APS reference style. If you're using REVTeX with BibTeX (which you should be), the formatting is handled automatically.
In-text citations: Superscript numbers, e.g., "as shown previously^{1,2}" or bracketed numbers [1,2] depending on REVTeX options. The default is superscript.
Reference list format (generated by BibTeX):
[1] A. B. Author and C. D. Author, Title of article, Phys. Rev. B 100, 123456 (2019).Key formatting details:
- Author names: First initials then last name (A. B. Smith)
- Journal titles abbreviated per APS conventions
- Volume in bold
- Page or article number followed by year in parentheses
- DOIs included automatically by modern BibTeX styles
- For books: Author, Title (Publisher, City, Year)
- For preprints: Author, arXiv:XXXX.XXXXX
The APS BibTeX style file (apsrev4-2.bst) handles all of this. Don't format references manually. Use a .bib file and let BibTeX do the work.
One important detail: PRB accepts and cites arXiv preprints in the reference list. This is standard practice in physics. If a paper is on arXiv but not yet published, cite the arXiv identifier. If it's been published, cite the journal version and optionally include the arXiv number.
There's no formal reference cap. Regular Articles commonly cite 30-60 references. Theoretical and review-like papers may cite 100+. Letters typically cite 20-30.
Supplementary material guidelines
APS handles Supplemental Material differently from Elsevier or Wiley. The material is hosted on the APS server and linked from the article page, but it's not typeset by APS.
What goes in Supplemental Material:
- Extended derivations and mathematical proofs
- Additional figures (band structures, phase diagrams, convergence tests)
- Computational details (pseudopotential parameters, convergence criteria, code versions)
- Raw data tables
- Video files (simulations, experimental processes)
Format requirements:
- Submit as a self-contained PDF (for text, figures, and tables)
- Use your own numbering (Fig. S1, Table S1, Section S1)
- Maximum 10 MB per file
- The PDF is published as-is, without APS typesetting
- Must be cited in the main text
Because APS doesn't typeset the Supplemental Material, it's your responsibility to make it look professional. Use the same REVTeX template for the supplement as for the main text. Include a title, author list, and clear section structure.
EPAPS (Electronic Physics Auxiliary Publication Service): This is APS's legacy system for supplementary data. You'll still see references to EPAPS in older papers, but the current system is simply called "Supplemental Material." Don't worry about EPAPS for new submissions.
A practical note: PRB reviewers have access to Supplemental Material during review. Some reviewers read it carefully; others don't. Don't put information in the supplement that's essential for understanding the main results. If a reviewer needs to check the supplement to follow your argument, that content probably belongs in the main paper.
LaTeX vs Word: what PRB actually prefers
Let's be direct: PRB strongly prefers LaTeX. The journal is built around the REVTeX document class, which is maintained by APS specifically for their journals. While Word submissions are technically accepted, they're the exception.
For LaTeX users (the vast majority):
- Use REVTeX 4.2:
\documentclass[aps,prb,reprint]{revtex4-2} - Available from APS's website, CTAN, and pre-installed in most TeX distributions
- Use BibTeX with the
apsrev4-2.bststyle file for references - The
preprintoption gives double-spaced, single-column output for review - The
reprintoption gives the approximate published layout for page count estimates
REVTeX options specific to PRB:
prbselects PRB-specific formattingtwocolumnproduces two-column layoutshowpacsdisplays PACS numbers (now deprecated, but the option persists)showkeysdisplays keywordslongbibliographyshows article titles in the reference list
For Word users (uncommon):
- APS provides a Word template, but it's basic
- Many PRB-specific formatting features (equation numbering, cross-references, BibTeX integration) don't work well in Word
- If your paper has significant mathematics, you'll struggle with Word
- The production team can handle Word, but expect more back-and-forth during typesetting
In condensed matter physics, LaTeX usage is near-universal. More than 95% of PRB submissions come in LaTeX. If you're not comfortable with LaTeX, PRB is a strong reason to learn. Overleaf provides a browser-based environment with the REVTeX template pre-loaded.
Submission process specifics
PRB uses the APS submission system at https://authors.aps.org.
Required components:
- Manuscript source files (
.tex,.bib, figure files) - Compiled PDF (generated from your LaTeX source)
- Supplemental Material (if any)
- Cover letter (optional but recommended for Letters)
APS-specific requirements:
- Author ORCID: Encouraged for all authors, required for the corresponding author
- Funding information: Must be included in the Acknowledgments section
- Data availability: APS encourages (but doesn't strictly require) a data availability statement
Length check for Letters: The submission system will flag Letters that exceed 4 published pages. You'll see a warning, and the editor will verify the page count before sending for review.
Embargo policy: APS allows posting of preprints on arXiv before, during, and after the review process. There's no conflict between arXiv posting and PRB submission. Most PRB papers appear on arXiv simultaneously with or before submission.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are the formatting details that experienced PRB authors know:
REVTeX is not optional. You can technically submit in Word, but don't. The production workflow, page count estimation, and reference formatting all assume REVTeX. Using it saves you and the editorial team significant effort.
Article numbers replaced page numbers. PRB switched from page numbers to article numbers in 2019. A reference to a 2020 paper looks like "Phys. Rev. B 101, 045101 (2020)" where 045101 is the article number. This is handled automatically by BibTeX with current .bst files.
No explicit Introduction heading. Following APS convention, PRB papers typically start with an unlabeled introductory section. The first heading is usually Section II (Methods, Model, Theory, etc.). This mirrors Nature's convention of omitting the "Introduction" heading.
Equation formatting matters. PRB is a physics journal. Equations are first-class content, not appendages. Number all important equations. Use \begin{equation} for standalone equations and \begin{align} for multi-line equations. Don't use $$...$$ (it's deprecated in LaTeX2e).
Appendices are common. PRB papers frequently include one or more appendices for detailed derivations, proofs, or extended analysis. These appear after the main text and before the references. Use \appendix followed by \section{Title} in REVTeX.
Color figure caution for print. Design figures to be readable in grayscale if you're choosing "color online, grayscale in print." PRB's production team will convert your RGB figures to grayscale for print, and they won't check whether the conversion preserves readability.
Two-column vs single-column figures. Use figure for single-column and figure for double-column (full-width) figures. Place figure environments at the top of the page for best results.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
These trip up PRB authors regularly:
- REVTeX version. Use REVTeX 4.2, not 4.1 or earlier. Older versions are still in some institutional templates but are missing current APS formatting options.
- BibTeX style file. Use
apsrev4-2.bst, notapsrev4-1.bstor generic styles. The older style files don't handle article numbers or DOIs correctly.
- Figure format. EPS is preferred. If you submit JPEG files with compression artifacts, reviewers and editors will notice. Export publication-quality vector graphics.
- Letter page count. 4 published pages is strict. Compile with the
reprintoption to check. Don't rely on thepreprint(double-spaced) page count.
- Supplemental Material formatting. APS publishes it as-is. If your supplemental PDF has typos, bad figure quality, or inconsistent formatting, that's what readers see.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to PRB, verify:
- Manuscript uses REVTeX 4.2 with the
prboption - Compiled PDF is clean with no LaTeX errors or warnings
- All figures are high-resolution (600 dpi line art, 300 dpi photos), preferably EPS
- References compiled with BibTeX using
apsrev4-2.bst - For Letters: page count is 4 or fewer (check with
reprintoption) - Supplemental Material is a polished, self-contained PDF
- All figures cited in numerical order
- Equations numbered sequentially
- Acknowledgments include funding information
Getting the technical formatting right at PRB is relatively painless if you use REVTeX and BibTeX as intended. The harder part is making sure your physics is clearly presented and your arguments are airtight. If you want to check your manuscript's overall readiness before submitting, run a free readiness scan to identify issues that lead to desk rejection or slow review.
For the most current PRB formatting guidelines, visit the Physical Review B Author Information page. REVTeX downloads and documentation are available at the REVTeX homepage.
If you're choosing between physics journals, our guides on Physical Review B impact factor and physics journal submission timelines can help you weigh your options.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.