PLOS ONE Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
PLOS ONE formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: PLOS ONE has no formal word limit, which makes it unusual among major journals. The abstract is unstructured and capped at 300 words. References use a numbered system with brackets (not superscripts). A Data Availability Statement is mandatory for every submission. PLOS ONE uses its own formatting templates for both Word and LaTeX. If you're used to journals with strict page limits, the flexibility here is both a benefit and a trap.
Word and page limits by article type
PLOS ONE publishes one main article type: Research Articles. There's no formal word limit, which is genuinely unusual in academic publishing. Most journals enforce word or page caps. PLOS ONE trusts authors to use the space they need.
Article Type | Word Limit | Abstract | Figures | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Research Article | No formal limit | 300 words (unstructured) | No strict limit | No strict cap |
Short Report | No formal limit | 300 words (unstructured) | No strict limit | No strict cap |
Lab Protocol | No formal limit | 300 words (unstructured) | No strict limit | No strict cap |
Study Protocol | No formal limit | 300 words (unstructured) | No strict limit | No strict cap |
Registered Report | No formal limit | 300 words (unstructured) | No strict limit | No strict cap |
In practice, most published PLOS ONE articles fall between 3,000 and 8,000 words of body text. Some methods-heavy papers or large cohort studies run longer. The lack of a word limit doesn't mean reviewers won't flag unnecessary length. If your paper is 15,000 words and could have been 7,000, expect reviewer comments about tightening the text.
The absence of a word limit is both PLOS ONE's greatest formatting advantage and its biggest style risk. Authors coming from word-limited journals sometimes write more than necessary because they can. Don't. Say what needs saying and stop. Reviewers at PLOS ONE evaluate scientific soundness, and a bloated manuscript signals lack of focus.
Short Reports at PLOS ONE aren't defined by a word count. They're articles that report a focused, single finding. The journal doesn't enforce a specific length difference between Research Articles and Short Reports.
Abstract requirements
PLOS ONE uses an unstructured abstract with a generous 300-word limit.
- Word limit: 300 words maximum
- Structure: Single paragraph, no subheadings
- Citations: Not allowed in the abstract
- Content: Should cover background, objective, methods, results, and conclusions
The 300-word cap gives you significantly more room than Nature (150), Cell Reports (150), or JCI (200). Use this space wisely. You can include more methodological detail and quantitative results than at most journals.
Despite being unstructured, your abstract should follow a logical flow: what the problem is, how you addressed it, what you found, and what it means. Some PLOS ONE reviewers specifically comment on abstracts that lack this implicit structure.
Keywords: PLOS ONE doesn't require author-submitted keywords in the traditional sense. Instead, authors select subject categories from a predefined taxonomy during submission. These categories are used for indexing and reviewer matching.
Figure and table specifications
PLOS ONE places no strict limit on the number of figures or tables, which aligns with its no-word-limit philosophy. However, the journal has specific technical requirements for figure quality.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Maximum figures | No strict limit |
Resolution | 300 dpi minimum (all types) |
File formats | TIFF, EPS (preferred), or high-resolution PDF, PNG, JPEG |
Color mode | RGB |
Maximum file size | 10 MB per figure |
Maximum dimensions | 2,250 x 2,625 pixels at 300 dpi (7.5 x 8.75 inches) |
Font in figures | Arial, Times, or Symbol, 8-12 pt |
Panel labels | Uppercase letters (A, B, C) |
PLOS-specific figure rules:
- Figures must be uploaded as separate files, not embedded in the manuscript
- Each figure file must be named according to PLOS convention: Fig1.tif, Fig2.tif, etc.
- PLOS uses a two-column layout, so figures should be designed for either single-column (roughly 3.27 inches/83 mm) or full-width (roughly 6.83 inches/173 mm) display
- No text should be smaller than 8 pt in the final figure
Table requirements:
- Tables must be included in the manuscript file (Word or LaTeX), not as separate image files
- Every column must have a header
- Use the PLOS table style: horizontal rules at top, bottom, and below headers. No vertical rules.
- Large tables (more than 1-2 pages) should be submitted as Supporting Information in a spreadsheet format
Supporting Information figures and tables: Labeled as S1 Fig, S2 Fig, S1 Table, S2 Table, etc. These appear in the Supporting Information section. Unlike some journals, PLOS ONE doesn't compile these into a single PDF. Each is uploaded as a separate file.
Reference format
PLOS ONE uses a numbered citation system based on Vancouver style, but with some PLOS-specific modifications.
In-text citations: Numbers in brackets, not superscripts. Example: "as demonstrated previously [1, 2]." Multiple citations are separated by commas within brackets. Ranges use an en dash: [3-7].
This is a critical detail. PLOS ONE uses brackets, not superscript numbers and not parentheses. Authors who've been formatting for Nature (superscript) or PNAS (parentheses) need to adjust.
Reference list format:
1. Smith AB, Jones CD, Williams EF. Title of article in sentence case. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(3):e0301234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301234Key formatting details:
- Author names: Last name, then initials without periods (e.g., "Smith AB")
- List all authors up to 6. For 7 or more, list the first 6 followed by "et al."
- Journal names abbreviated per NLM standards
- Include volume, issue number in parentheses, and page/article number
- DOIs are required for all references that have them
- URLs and access dates required for web references
Important: PLOS ONE requires DOIs in references. This is enforced more strictly than at most journals. If a cited work has a DOI, it must be included. Missing DOIs will be flagged during technical review.
There's no reference cap. Cite what's necessary.
Data availability statement
The Data Availability Statement is one of PLOS ONE's defining features. The journal was a pioneer in requiring open data, and the policy is strictly enforced.
What's required: Every PLOS ONE submission must include a Data Availability Statement specifying where the data underlying all results in the manuscript can be accessed.
Acceptable data locations:
- Within the paper and its Supporting Information files
- In a public repository (Dryad, Figshare, Zenodo, GEO, etc.)
- Available upon request (only when legal or ethical restrictions apply)
What's not acceptable: "Data available upon request from the corresponding author" is not sufficient unless there are documented legal or ethical constraints. PLOS ONE expects data to be freely accessible.
This isn't a soft requirement. Papers have been rejected or retracted for failing to comply with PLOS ONE's data availability policy. If your data has access restrictions (patient identifiers, proprietary datasets), you need to explain the restriction clearly and provide a contact for data access requests.
Where it goes: The Data Availability Statement is entered into a separate field in the submission system, not in the manuscript body. It's published with the article in a prominent location.
Supporting Information guidelines
PLOS ONE uses the term "Supporting Information" (not "Supplementary Materials" or "SI Appendix"). Supporting Information is published alongside the article and accessible to all readers.
Types of Supporting Information:
- S1 Fig, S2 Fig, etc.: Supporting figures
- S1 Table, S2 Table, etc.: Supporting tables (preferably in XLSX format)
- S1 File, S2 File, etc.: Supporting documents, datasets, code
- S1 Video, S2 Video, etc.: Video files
- S1 Text: Extended methods or additional narrative
Formatting rules:
- Each Supporting Information item is uploaded as a separate file
- Each item needs a title and a brief legend (entered in the submission system)
- In the main text, cite supporting items as "S1 Fig" not "Supplementary Figure 1"
- There's no page or file count limit, but each file has a 25 MB size cap
- For larger files, use a public repository and cite the DOI
Supporting Information is not peer-reviewed at PLOS ONE. This is different from journals like Cell Reports or Nature, where supplementary data undergoes full review. At PLOS ONE, reviewers may look at supporting files, but they're not required to evaluate them. This means the supporting information doesn't carry the same evidentiary weight as the main text.
LaTeX vs Word: what PLOS ONE actually expects
PLOS ONE supports both Word and LaTeX equally and provides well-maintained templates for both.
Word template: Available from the PLOS ONE submission guidelines page. The template includes all required sections and formatting styles.
LaTeX template: PLOS provides plos_latex_template.tex along with the plos2015.bst bibliography style file. The template is available on the PLOS website and on Overleaf. It's one of the more polished journal LaTeX templates available.
Which should you use? PLOS ONE genuinely supports both formats equally. The production pipeline handles LaTeX well, and there's no implicit preference for Word. Choose whichever format your team works in.
Submission format:
- Initial submission: Submit all files through the submission system. The manuscript should be in Word (.docx) or LaTeX (.tex with all associated files). Figures are uploaded as separate files. PLOS ONE does not accept single-PDF submissions.
- Revision: Same format as initial submission. Track changes in Word or use latexdiff for LaTeX.
A PLOS-specific quirk: Unlike many journals that accept a single PDF for initial review, PLOS ONE requires separate manuscript and figure files from the start. This can be frustrating if you're used to submitting a compiled PDF, but it's how PLOS ONE's technical check system works.
Cover letter and title page
Title page requirements (first page of manuscript):
- Full title
- Short title (running head, 40 characters max)
- Author names with affiliations (numbered superscripts)
- Corresponding author designation with email
- Author contributions
- No abstract on the title page (abstract goes on a separate page)
Cover letter is optional at PLOS ONE. This is different from selective journals where the cover letter is a critical part of the evaluation. PLOS ONE evaluates papers on scientific soundness, not perceived impact, so a cover letter arguing for significance isn't necessary. If you do include one, keep it brief.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are the details that PLOS ONE regulars know:
No assessment of perceived impact. PLOS ONE reviews papers for scientific validity and methodological soundness, not for novelty or significance. This affects formatting indirectly: you don't need to spend word count arguing why your work is groundbreaking. Just present the science clearly.
Author contributions are mandatory. PLOS ONE requires that author contributions be listed using the CRediT taxonomy. Each author must be assigned at least one CRediT role: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing.
Financial disclosure statement. Mandatory. Must list all funding sources and grant numbers. If there's no external funding, state "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."
Competing interests statement. Mandatory, even if there are none. Use: "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."
Ethics statement. Required for all studies involving human participants, animal subjects, or identifiable human data. Must include IRB/IACUC names, approval numbers, and consent procedures.
ORCID iDs. Required for all corresponding authors. PLOS ONE has progressively expanded its ORCID requirements.
Abbreviations. Define at first use in both the abstract and the main text. PLOS ONE provides a list of standard abbreviations that don't need definition (DNA, RNA, PCR, etc.).
Heading structure. PLOS ONE uses the standard IMRAD structure: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion. Subheadings within each section are allowed and encouraged for readability.
No footnotes. PLOS ONE doesn't allow footnotes in the main text. All clarifying information should be incorporated into the text or placed in Supporting Information.
Frequently missed formatting details
- Separate files from the start. PLOS ONE requires separate manuscript and figure files at initial submission. No single-PDF submissions.
- Figure file naming. Files must be named Fig1.tif, Fig2.tif, etc. Not "Figure_1_final_v3.tif" or any other creative naming scheme.
- Data Availability Statement goes in the submission system. It's not in the manuscript body. Authors who put it in the manuscript but skip the submission system field will be flagged.
- DOIs in references. Include them for every reference that has one. PLOS ONE checks this during technical review.
- No footnotes. This catches authors who habitually use footnotes for definitions or asides.
- CRediT taxonomy for author contributions. Free-text descriptions of author roles aren't accepted. Use the specific CRediT role terms.
- Short title is 40 characters max. Not 40 words. Characters. This is tight. Plan accordingly.
- Line numbers. Required. Continuous numbering throughout the manuscript.
Open access and APC
PLOS ONE is fully open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. An article processing charge (APC) is required upon acceptance.
The current PLOS ONE APC is approximately $1,900. This is lower than most high-profile open-access journals (Science Advances charges roughly $4,500, for comparison). PLOS offers fee assistance programs for authors who can't pay, and ability to pay never influences editorial decisions.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to PLOS ONE:
- Manuscript in Word or LaTeX format (not a single PDF)
- Abstract is 300 words or fewer, unstructured
- Short title is 40 characters or fewer
- Figures uploaded as separate files, named Fig1, Fig2, etc.
- All figures are at least 300 dpi
- References in numbered bracket format with DOIs included
- Data Availability Statement completed in the submission system
- Author contributions listed using CRediT taxonomy
- Financial disclosure and competing interests statements included
- Ethics statement present for all human/animal research
- ORCID iD for corresponding author
- Line numbers throughout
PLOS ONE's lack of word limits and figure caps makes it one of the most flexible journals to format for. The catch is in the details: data availability, CRediT taxonomy, figure file naming, and the no-footnotes rule. If you want to verify that your manuscript meets all technical requirements before submission, run a free formatting scan to catch the issues that delay review.
For the latest guidelines, visit the PLOS ONE submission guidelines page.
If you're evaluating PLOS ONE against other open-access options, our guides on Scientific Reports formatting and eLife formatting requirements cover journals with similar open-access models.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.