What is the impact factor of Cell Reports?

Cell Reports has an impact factor of 6.9 (2024). This places it as a respected journal with Cell Reports publishes peer-reviewed research across the entire life sciences spectrum.

How long does Cell Reports take to review?

Cell Reports typically takes 5 days median to first editorial decision. The full review process involves 6 main stages: submission, editorial triage, and peer review.

How much does it cost to publish in Cell Reports?

Cell Reports charges $5,790 USD as an article processing charge. This fee covers open access publication costs and makes your work freely available to readers worldwide.

All Journal Guides

Journal Guide

Cell Reports Impact Factor 6.9: Publishing Guide

Q: What is the acceptance rate of Cell Reports?

Cell Reports has an acceptance rate of ~15-20%. A common reason for rejection is treating it as a consolation prize for cell rejection. Editors can tell when a paper was written for Cell and hastily reformatted. Cell Reports has its own identity and expectations. Tailor your manuscript to this journal specifically.

Q: Is Cell Reports peer reviewed?

Yes, Cell Reports is fully peer reviewed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review by Typically 2-3 expert reviewers. Reviews assess both technical soundness and biological significance. Editors sometimes struggle to find reviewers, which can delay things..

Q: What does Cell Reports look for in submissions?

New biological insight, period: This is the phrase they repeat constantly. Your paper needs to reveal something new about how biology works. Descriptive cataloging or incremental parameter tweaks won't cut it, even if the data is technically solid.

Q: What should I know before submitting to Cell Reports?

The Report format is the sweet spot. Cell Reports was literally built around the shorter Report format. A clean 4-figure story with one strong biological point is ideal. Many successful papers here would have been stretched thin as full articles elsewhere.

Cell Press quality without the Cell-level marathon. The open-access home for solid biology with a clear point.

6.9

Impact Factor (2024)

~15-20%

Acceptance Rate

5 days median to first editorial decision

Time to First Decision

What Cell Reports Publishes

Cell Reports publishes peer-reviewed research across the entire life sciences spectrum. The primary criterion is new biological insight. Unlike Cell, which demands exhaustive mechanistic dissection, Cell Reports prizes focused stories that make a clear point well. Think of it as: you have one strong finding with real biological meaning, and you can tell that story concisely. That is a Cell Reports paper.

Research reporting new biological insight across all life sciences
Focused, single-point studies with clear significance (Reports format)
Deeper mechanistic work when well-supported (Article format)
Major datasets, tools, or technical advances with demonstrated biological utility (Resources)
Studies spanning cell biology, genetics, immunology, neuroscience, cancer biology, and more

Editor Insight

“Cell Reports occupies a specific niche in the Cell Press family. It is not where Cell rejects go to die. The editors genuinely value focused, well-told stories over exhaustive mechanistic marathons. Papers that try to be mini-Cell papers usually miss the mark. The best Cell Reports papers have one clear finding that changes how you think about a biological question, and they make that point in 4 figures. Editors also respond well to papers from groups they haven't seen before. This journal is more meritocratic and less brand-driven than its parent.”

What Cell Reports Editors Look For

New biological insight, period

This is the phrase they repeat constantly. Your paper needs to reveal something new about how biology works. Descriptive cataloging or incremental parameter tweaks won't cut it, even if the data is technically solid.

A clear, focused story

Cell Reports values concise storytelling. The Report format (up to 4 figures) is their signature. One well-supported biological point, cleanly presented. If your story needs 15 supplemental figures to hold together, it might belong elsewhere.

Broad accessibility

Cell Reports readers span all of biology. Your abstract and introduction should make sense to a cell biologist even if your work is in plant immunity. Write for the educated non-specialist.

Conceptual advance over prior work

The most common desk rejection reason at Cell Reports is 'insufficient conceptual advance.' Editors need to see clearly what you discovered that nobody knew before. Connecting dots isn't enough; you need a new dot.

Appropriate scope for the format

Cell Reports is not Cell-lite. It is a distinct journal with its own niche. Papers that feel like incomplete Cell submissions or padded PNAS papers will be recognized as such.

Good figures and graphical abstract

Cell Press has high visual standards across all its journals. Figures should be clear and publication-ready. The graphical abstract is required and widely seen on social media.

Why Papers Get Rejected

These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Cell Reports's editorial review:

Treating it as a consolation prize for Cell rejection

Editors can tell when a paper was written for Cell and hastily reformatted. Cell Reports has its own identity and expectations. Tailor your manuscript to this journal specifically.

Submitting descriptive work without mechanistic insight

'We observed X in Y conditions' is not biological insight. Editors want to know why X happens, or what it means for the broader biology. Even Reports need a conceptual point.

Exceeding word and figure limits

Reports: 4,000 words, 4 figures. Articles: 7,000 words, 7 figures. These are firm limits. Submitting over-length signals you haven't read the guidelines and wastes everyone's time.

Weak cover letter

In-house editors handle manuscripts across many fields. Your cover letter needs to quickly explain the biological insight and why it matters to a broad audience. Generic letters get generic responses.

Ignoring the transfer option strategically

Cell Reports frequently transfers rejected papers to iScience. If your paper is borderline, editors may suggest this. It's worth understanding both journals before you submit.

Not using STAR Methods properly

Cell Press uses Structured, Transparent, Accessible Reporting (STAR Methods). Putting methods in the wrong sections or skipping the Key Resources Table causes delays.

Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?

The quick diagnostic reads your full manuscript against Cell Reports's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.

Run Free Readiness Scan →

Insider Tips from Cell Reports Authors

The Report format is the sweet spot

Cell Reports was literally built around the shorter Report format. A clean 4-figure story with one strong biological point is ideal. Many successful papers here would have been stretched thin as full articles elsewhere.

Transfers from Cell are common and accepted

Many Cell Reports papers started as Cell submissions. This is totally fine and editors expect it. But rewrite your cover letter and reframe the story for Cell Reports scope. Don't just forward the Cell rejection.

In-house editors are scientists, not bureaucrats

Cell Press editors typically have PhDs and postdoc experience. They read your paper with scientific judgment, not just checklist compliance. This means good science can overcome formatting issues, but bad science can't hide behind formatting.

Desk decisions come fast, so submit when ready

Median 5 days to first editorial decision. You will know quickly if your paper has a chance. This makes Cell Reports a good first-choice target: fast no means fast pivot.

The $5,790 APC is real

Cell Reports is fully open access. Budget for this. Fee waivers and discounts exist but aren't automatic. Some funders (Wellcome, NIH, ERC) cover APCs. Check before you submit.

Reviews are generally constructive

SciRev feedback shows Cell Reports reviewers tend to be knowledgeable and reviews tend to be substantive. Expect 2-3 reviewers. One round of revision is typical for accepted papers, though some go through two.

Graphical abstracts get your paper noticed

Cell Press promotes papers heavily on social media using graphical abstracts. Invest time in this. A compelling graphical abstract can drive thousands of downloads in the first week.

Consider the Resource format for datasets and tools

If you have a major dataset or new method with biological validation, the Resource format is specifically designed for this. It has the same word limit as Articles but emphasizes technical contribution.

The Cell Reports Submission Process

Submission

Allow 1-2 days for technical checks

Complete manuscript with cover letter, graphical abstract, STAR Methods, and Key Resources Table. Suggest 3-5 reviewers. Choose Report, Article, or Resource format.

Editorial triage

~5 days median

In-house editors assess fit, novelty, and biological insight. High desk rejection rate. Common response: 'insufficient conceptual advance.' May suggest transfer to iScience.

Peer review

4-8 weeks typical (some reports of longer waits)

Typically 2-3 expert reviewers. Reviews assess both technical soundness and biological significance. Editors sometimes struggle to find reviewers, which can delay things.

Decision after review

~37 days median from submission to post-review decision

Accept, reject, or revise. Revision requests are usually reasonable in scope compared to Cell. One round of revision is typical.

Revision and acceptance

~177 days median from submission to final acceptance

Address reviewer concerns. Cell Reports generally doesn't demand massive new experiments like Cell does. Focused additions and clarifications are more common.

Publication

~22 days from acceptance to online publication

Online publication after acceptance. Open access under CC BY license. Weekly publication schedule.

Cell Reports by the Numbers

2024 Impact Factor(Clarivate JCR)	6.7
CiteScore(Scopus 2024)	15.1
Median to first decision	5 days
Median to post-review decision	37 days
Median to acceptance	177 days
Articles published per year	~1,500
Article Processing Charge	$5,790 USD
Publication frequency	Weekly (open access)

Before you submit

Cell Reports accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.

The pre-submission diagnostic runs a live literature search, scores your manuscript section by section, and gives you a prioritized fix list calibrated to Cell Reports. ~30 minutes.

Run Free Readiness Scan See a sample report

Article Types

Report

4,000 words, up to 4 figures/tables

Shorter, single-point studies reporting a clear biological insight. The signature format of Cell Reports.

Article

7,000 words, up to 7 figures/tables

Longer format for work with deeper mechanistic insight requiring more extensive data presentation.

Resource

7,000 words, up to 7 figures/tables

Major technical advances or informational datasets that demonstrate a biological advance. Same limits as Articles.

Review

Variable

Reviews covering recent literature in emerging and active fields. Both solicited and unsolicited.

Preview

~1,000 words, 1-2 figures

Short commentaries highlighting research papers in the same issue or recent issues of other journals.

Landmark Cell Reports Papers

Papers that defined fields and changed science:

Life Extension Factor Klotho Enhances Cognition (Dubal et al., 2014)
The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS forms an oligomeric complex with DNA (Zhang et al., 2014)
Intrinsic membrane hyperexcitability of ALS patient-derived motor neurons (Wainger et al., 2014)
Long-Term Health of Dopaminergic Neuron Transplants in Parkinson's Disease Patients (Hallett et al., 2014)
RNAi factors are present and active in human cell nuclei (Gagnon et al., 2014)

Preparing a Cell Reports Submission?

Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Cell Reports and know exactly what editors look for.

Run Free Readiness Scan

Need expert depth? Human review from $1,000

NDA-protected

Confidential

Primary Fields

Cell BiologyMolecular BiologyGenetics & GenomicsImmunologyNeuroscienceCancer BiologyDevelopmental BiologyStem Cell BiologyMicrobiologyComputational Biology

Related Journal Guides

All journal guides

All articles

Compare Journals

Cell Press Journals: How to Choose

Ready to submit to Cell Reports?

A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Cell Reports editors look for.

Need field-expert depth? Human review from $1,000