Sustainability (MDPI) Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Sustainability MDPI formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Sustainability (MDPI) doesn't enforce a strict word limit for research articles, requires a 200-word unstructured abstract, and uses the MDPI numbered reference style with square-bracket citations. The journal accepts both Word and LaTeX via the official MDPI templates. All articles are open access, and color figures are free.
Word and page limits by article type
Sustainability is one of the largest open access journals in the social sciences and environmental sciences, publishing thousands of articles annually. The journal doesn't set hard word limits for most article types, but it does provide guidance on typical lengths.
Article Type | Word Limit | Abstract | Figures/Tables | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Research Article | No strict limit (typically 5,000-10,000) | 200 words | No cap | Standard IMRAD or flexible |
Review | No strict limit (often 8,000-15,000) | 200 words | No cap | Flexible structure |
Communication | 2,000-4,000 words | 200 words | Limited (2-3 items) | Abbreviated |
Brief Report | 2,000-3,000 words | 200 words | 2-3 items | Abbreviated |
Perspective | No strict limit | 200 words | Flexible | Flexible |
Editorial | 1,000-2,000 words | Optional | Minimal | Flexible |
The absence of a strict word limit doesn't mean length is irrelevant. Reviewers at Sustainability regularly flag papers that are padded with unnecessary repetition or overly long literature reviews. A focused 6,000-word paper will fare better in review than a bloated 12,000-word manuscript that repeats itself.
Communications are the exception. These are short papers presenting preliminary findings or a single novel observation, and they need to stay under 4,000 words. If your paper grows beyond this, convert it to a full Research Article.
One practical consideration: Sustainability uses a single-column layout for the final published version, which means your manuscript will look similar in the submission format and the published format. This makes it easier to judge your own paper's length during writing.
Abstract requirements
Sustainability follows the standard MDPI abstract format, which is straightforward but has specific constraints.
- Word limit: 200 words maximum (150-word minimum recommended)
- Structure: Unstructured (single paragraph)
- Citations: Not allowed
- Abbreviations: Avoid unless universally understood (e.g., DNA, GDP)
- Keywords: 3 to 10 keywords required, listed immediately after the abstract
The abstract should summarize the background motivation in one sentence, describe the methods briefly, and present the main findings with specific quantitative results where possible. Don't end the abstract with a vague promise like "implications are discussed." State what those implications are.
Keywords should not duplicate words already in the title. MDPI's system uses keywords for indexing and discoverability, so choose terms that a researcher searching for your topic would actually type. Avoid overly broad keywords like "environment" or "sustainability" (the journal name already covers that).
A formatting detail specific to MDPI: keywords are separated by semicolons, not commas. Each keyword starts with a lowercase letter unless it's a proper noun. This small detail trips up authors coming from journals that use comma-separated, capitalized keywords.
Figure and table specifications
Sustainability publishes online only, which means generous allowances for figures and tables. There's no strict limit on the number of display items.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Resolution (minimum) | 300 dpi for all figure types |
Preferred resolution | 600 dpi for line art, 300 dpi for photographs |
File formats | TIFF, PNG, JPEG, or EPS |
Color | Free (no charge for color) |
Maximum width | 180 mm (full page) or 85 mm (half page) |
Font in figures | Arial or Times New Roman, minimum 8 pt |
Figure caption placement | Below the figure |
Vector graphics | Preferred for charts and diagrams |
Table formatting: MDPI uses a clean, minimal table style. Tables have a horizontal rule at the top, below the header row, and at the bottom. No vertical rules. No shading unless it serves a clear purpose (like highlighting specific cells in a data comparison). Table captions go above the table.
Figures should be submitted as separate high-resolution files in addition to being embedded in the manuscript. During the initial submission through the MDPI Submission System (SuSy), you'll upload figures both inline and as individual files.
A practical MDPI-specific detail: if your figure has multiple panels, label them (a), (b), (c) and define each in the caption. MDPI's production team is strict about figure panel labeling consistency. If your figure says "(A)" but your caption says "(a)," you'll get a correction request.
For maps, include scale bars and compass directions. MDPI's editorial office specifically checks cartographic figures for these elements.
Reference format
Sustainability uses the MDPI reference style, which is a numbered sequential system shared across all MDPI journals.
In-text citations: Numbers in square brackets, assigned in order of first appearance. Multiple citations are separated by commas: [1,2,3] or as a range: [1-3]. Place the citation before the period at the end of a sentence.
Reference list format:
1. Author, A.B.; Author, C.D.; Author, E.F. Title of the Article. Journal Name Year, Volume, Page Range. https://doi.org/xxxxxKey formatting details:
- Author names: Last Name, First Initial(s). Use semicolons between authors.
- List all authors (MDPI doesn't use "et al." in the reference list regardless of author count).
- Journal names are written in italics, not abbreviated.
- MDPI doesn't abbreviate journal titles. Write "Journal of Cleaner Production," not "J. Clean. Prod." This is a significant departure from most other publishers.
- DOIs are required for all entries that have them.
- For books: include publisher name and location (city, country).
- For web sources: include the full URL and the access date.
There is no formal cap on the number of references. Research articles typically cite 40 to 80 sources. Review papers regularly exceed 100 references without issue.
A common mistake with MDPI formatting: using abbreviated journal titles. If your reference management software (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) is set to abbreviate journal names, you'll need to switch it to full titles before generating your bibliography. The MDPI house style is explicit about this.
Supplementary material guidelines
MDPI journals, including Sustainability, support supplementary materials that are published alongside the article as downloadable files.
Supported supplementary types:
- Additional figures and tables
- Extended datasets (Excel, CSV)
- Survey instruments and questionnaires
- Code and scripts
- Video and audio files
- Appendices that would interrupt the main text flow
Supplementary materials are cited in the main text as "Figure S1," "Table S1," etc. Each supplementary file needs a descriptive title and brief caption.
One important policy: MDPI supplementary materials undergo peer review along with the main manuscript. Reviewers have access to all supplementary files and are expected to evaluate them. Don't treat supplementary material as a dumping ground for low-quality content.
File size limits are generous (up to 60 MB per file for most formats). For datasets larger than this, MDPI encourages deposition in a public repository (like Figshare, Dryad, or Zenodo) with the DOI cited in the paper.
MDPI also supports a "Data Availability Statement" that must appear at the end of the manuscript, before the references. You need to specify where the data supporting your findings can be accessed, even if the answer is "available from the corresponding author upon request."
LaTeX vs Word: what Sustainability actually prefers
Both formats are fully supported. MDPI provides templates for each.
LaTeX template: MDPI's LaTeX template uses the mdpi document class:
\documentclass[sustainability,article]{mdpi}The journal name is passed as an option to the document class, which configures journal-specific formatting automatically. The template package includes the .cls file, a .bst bibliography style file, and a sample manuscript. It's available on Overleaf for easy setup.
Word template: The MDPI Word template provides pre-formatted styles for all manuscript elements. It uses a single-column layout that matches the final published format closely. Styles are provided for headings, body text, figure captions, table captions, equations, and references.
Practical recommendations:
- For social science and policy-oriented papers (common in Sustainability), Word is typically faster and easier. These papers rarely have complex equations.
- For quantitative or modeling-heavy papers, LaTeX handles equations and algorithm formatting more cleanly.
- MDPI's production pipeline handles both formats equally well. There is no editorial preference.
One MDPI-specific workflow consideration: the submission system (SuSy) can be finicky with LaTeX uploads. Submit your compiled PDF alongside the source files to avoid rendering issues in the system. The editorial office will use your source files for production, but the PDF serves as the reference version during review.
At the accepted manuscript stage, MDPI's production team may convert Word files to their internal LaTeX pipeline for typesetting. This is invisible to authors, but it means that minor formatting differences between your Word submission and the final published version are normal.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are the details that experienced Sustainability authors know but newcomers miss:
Section structure is flexible. Unlike many journals that mandate IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), Sustainability allows flexible section headings. Many published articles use custom sections like "Theoretical Framework," "Case Study," or "Policy Implications." The introduction should still appear, but subsequent sections can follow the structure that best serves your paper.
Author contributions statement. Mandatory for all articles with multiple authors. Must appear after the conclusions, using this exact format: "Conceptualization, A.B. and C.D.; methodology, A.B.; software, C.D.; validation, A.B., C.D. and E.F...." MDPI uses the CRediT taxonomy categories specifically.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) statements. If your research involved human subjects, you must include an "Institutional Review Board Statement" section. If it didn't, you still need the section, stating "Not applicable." MDPI editors check for this and will send the paper back if it's missing.
Informed consent statement. Same requirement as the IRB statement. Include it even if your paper is purely quantitative or computational. State "Not applicable" when relevant.
Conflicts of interest declaration. Mandatory. Must appear as its own section titled "Conflicts of Interest" (not "Competing Interests" or "Declaration of Interest"). If there are none, state "The authors declare no conflicts of interest."
Special issue considerations. A large proportion of Sustainability articles are published in Special Issues. If you're submitting to a Special Issue, your paper still goes through the same peer review process. The Guest Editor manages the review but doesn't bypass quality standards. However, Special Issue papers may have slightly more flexibility on topic scope compared to regular submissions.
No running headers. The MDPI template doesn't include running headers or footers in the manuscript. Don't add them manually. The production team adds these during typesetting.
Numbering. Sections use Arabic numerals (1., 1.1., 1.1.1., etc.). Don't use Roman numerals. Figures and tables are numbered sequentially throughout the paper, not by section.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
- Keywords use semicolons, not commas. This is the single most common formatting error in MDPI submissions. Separate keywords with semicolons.
- Full journal names in references. Don't abbreviate. Write "Environmental Science and Technology," not "Environ. Sci. Technol."
- Data Availability Statement is mandatory. Even if your data isn't publicly shared, you need this section.
- All authors listed in references. MDPI doesn't use "et al." in the reference list, no matter how many authors a cited paper has. List every author.
- Figure files submitted separately. Even though figures are embedded in the manuscript, you must also upload them as individual files through SuSy.
Submission checklist
Before you submit to Sustainability, verify:
- Manuscript uses the official MDPI template (Word or LaTeX)
- Abstract is 150-200 words, unstructured, no citations
- 3-10 keywords listed, separated by semicolons, lowercase
- References use MDPI style with full journal names and DOIs
- Author Contributions section uses CRediT taxonomy
- Data Availability Statement is included
- Conflicts of Interest section is present
- IRB Statement and Informed Consent Statement are present (even if "Not applicable")
- Figures meet resolution requirements (300 dpi minimum)
- All figures submitted as separate files in addition to being in the manuscript
Getting the formatting right avoids unnecessary back-and-forth with the editorial office. But formatting is only one piece of a successful submission. If you want to check your manuscript's overall readiness, run a free readiness scan to identify structural and presentation issues before they reach reviewers.
For the most current templates and guidelines, visit MDPI's Instructions for Authors for Sustainability. Template files for Word and LaTeX are available through the same page.
If you're evaluating where to publish your sustainability research, our guides on journal impact factors and open access publishing costs can help you weigh your options.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.