Journal Guide
Publishing in Sustainability: Fit, Timeline & Submission Guide
Applied sustainability research that links evidence to policy, practice, and systems-level decisions
Should you submit here?
Submit if sustainability values papers that show interconnections. Be careful if many papers thoroughly document environmental problems but offer no actionable solutions or policy recommendations.
Best fit if
Sustainability values papers that show interconnections
Not ideal if
Many papers thoroughly document environmental problems but offer no actionable solutions or policy recommendations
Also compare
3.3
Impact Factor (2024)
~35-45%
Acceptance Rate
~2-6 weeks
Time to First Decision
Submission guide
Sustainability submission guide
Submitting to Sustainability? Learn article structure, formatting priorities, ethics and data requirements, and what editors want before they send a.
Journal assessment
Is Sustainability a Good Journal? Fit Verdict
A practical Sustainability fit verdict for authors deciding whether the manuscript has real systems, policy, or implementation value.
Desk rejection
How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Sustainability
How to avoid desk rejection at Sustainability by proving systems thinking, solution pathways, and real implementation logic.
What Sustainability Publishes
Sustainability is a large open-access MDPI journal covering environmental science, sustainable development, policy, business, urban systems, and interdisciplinary sustainability research. The latest official Clarivate figure available in 2026 is a 2024 JIF of 3.3, with Q2 ranking in Environmental Sciences. Its real editorial bar is not prestige-first novelty. It's whether the study is within scope, methodologically sound, and framed around a genuine sustainability question rather than a generic environmental observation. Papers do better when they connect evidence to practical action, policy design, implementation tradeoffs, or system-wide consequences.
- Environmental sustainability: climate change mitigation, renewable energy, ecosystem conservation
- Social sustainability: social equity, community resilience, environmental justice
- Economic sustainability: circular economy, sustainable business practices, green finance
- Urban and regional sustainability: sustainable cities, land use, transportation
- Water and resource management: freshwater, marine ecosystems, natural resource conservation
- Waste management and recycling: circular economy implementation, pollution reduction
- Policy and governance: environmental regulation, international agreements, stakeholder engagement
- Systems analysis: life cycle assessment, carbon footprinting, sustainability metrics
Editor Insight
“Sustainability publishes research that bridges science and solutions. The best papers document real problems AND propose feasible pathways forward, considering economic and social dimensions equally with environmental. We seek work that actually influences practice and policy, not just adds to the literature.”
What Sustainability Editors Look For
Systems-level perspective, not just individual problems
Sustainability values papers that show interconnections. Don't just document pollution - explain how it connects to economic incentives, policy failures, and social vulnerabilities. Papers linking environmental problems to systemic causes and multi-stakeholder solutions are stronger than isolated technical fixes.
Quantifiable solutions or policy pathways
Identify the problem clearly, but equally emphasize solutions. What specific actions reduce emissions? How much improvement occurs with policy change X? Sustainability publishes problem-identification, but impact is highest when coupled with demonstrated or proposed solutions with measurable outcomes.
Interdisciplinary framing and stakeholder perspective
Environmental problems require environmental AND economic AND social analysis. Papers addressing only one dimension (pure science without policy feasibility, or policy without environmental mechanism) feel incomplete. Include perspectives from multiple disciplines or stakeholder groups.
Real-world validation or practical applicability
Lab-scale results or theoretical models need grounding in actual practice. If you propose a waste reduction strategy, test it with real organizations. If you model carbon reduction, show how communities or industries could actually adopt it. Theory + practical validation is much stronger.
Clear communication for diverse readership
Sustainability attracts scientists, engineers, policymakers, and business professionals. Avoid heavy jargon. Explain why environmental problems matter beyond the specialist community. Use figures and tables that communicate key findings clearly to non-specialists.
Why Papers Get Rejected
These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Sustainability's editorial review:
Focusing solely on environmental documentation without solutions
Many papers thoroughly document environmental problems but offer no actionable solutions or policy recommendations. Sustainability values problem-identification, but impact is maximized when coupled with solution pathways or policy frameworks that address root causes.
Proposing solutions without considering economic feasibility or social acceptance
Technical solutions that ignore cost, scalability, or stakeholder acceptance face criticism. If you propose renewable energy adoption, address cost barriers and community concerns. Technically sound but economically or socially implausible solutions have limited real-world impact.
Isolated technical improvements without systems perspective
Optimizing one process (e.g., reducing waste in manufacturing) without considering supply chain or consumer behavior changes has limited sustainability impact. Best papers show how interventions cascade through systems.
Weak connection between research and actual policy or business practice
Papers that ignore existing policy frameworks, regulatory barriers, or business incentives feel disconnected from reality. Acknowledge what already exists and explain how your findings shift practice or policy within those constraints.
Overclaiming sustainability benefits without lifecycle or systemic analysis
Claiming a product or practice is 'sustainable' without life-cycle assessment or comparative analysis against alternatives is common. Back up claims with data showing true sustainability improvement across the full system.
Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?
The Free Readiness Scan reads your full manuscript against Sustainability's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.
Insider Tips from Sustainability Authors
Open access + broad readership = high visibility for policy impact
Sustainability's open-access model means your work reaches policymakers and practitioners, not just academics. Frame findings with policy and business applications explicitly. Papers that address real sustainability challenges often get cited by government and industry reports.
Special issues and topic collections increase discoverability
Sustainability publishes special issues on themes like circular economy, climate adaptation, and sustainable cities. Submitting to a relevant special issue increases editorial attention and reader engagement. Check the journal website for upcoming topics.
Case studies and real-world applications are highly valued
Research documenting actual implementation of sustainability solutions - carbon reduction in a manufacturing facility, waste reduction in a community, renewable energy adoption in a region - often outperforms purely theoretical papers. Real-world validation matters.
Include stakeholder perspectives in your framing
Papers that acknowledge perspectives of government, industry, communities, and other stakeholders demonstrate systems thinking. Interviewing or surveying stakeholders about feasibility strengthens policy relevance.
Use clear visualizations for non-specialist audiences
Sustainability reaches policymakers and business leaders who may lack technical background. Infographics, clear charts, and accessible summaries of key findings significantly increase impact and citations.
The Sustainability Submission Process
Manuscript preparation
PrepOriginal research: 7,000-10,000 words. Reviews and perspectives: flexible length. MDPI template. Include figures and supplementary data. Highlight practical or policy implications in abstract and conclusion.
Submission via MDPI system
Day 0Submit at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/submit. Required: manuscript, figures, supplementary materials, author statement including contributions and funding. Conflict of interest disclosure.
Editorial assessment
1-3 weeksEditor assesses scope, relevance to sustainability, and practical implications. Papers purely documenting environmental problems without solutions face lower priority. Moderate desk rejection rate (~30-40%).
Peer review
60-90 days2-3 reviewers assess scientific rigor, novelty, and sustainability relevance. Reviews often constructive and developmental. First decision typically 60-90 days.
Revision and publication
Revision: 2-4 weeksMinor revisions common. Publication occurs quickly after acceptance (2-4 weeks typically). Open access publication immediate upon acceptance.
Sustainability by the Numbers
| 2024 Impact Factor | 3.3 |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 3.6 |
| Acceptance rate | ~35-45% |
| Desk rejection rate | Meaningful, especially for weak scope fit |
| Typical first decision | ~2-6 weeks |
| Open access model | Full OA, APC required |
| Publisher | MDPI |
| Founded | 2009 |
Before you submit
Sustainability accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full AI Diagnostic for $29. If you need deeper scientific feedback, choose Expert Review. The full report is calibrated to Sustainability.
Article Types
Original Research
7,000-10,000 wordsComplete research with methodology and findings
Review Article
Flexible; typically 10,000-15,000 wordsComprehensive review of sustainability topic
Perspective/Commentary
3,000-5,000 wordsOpinion and analysis of sustainability issue
Landmark Sustainability Papers
Papers that defined fields and changed science:
- The Limits to Growth (Meadows et al., 1972) - foundational systems analysis of sustainability constraints
- Planetary Boundaries framework (Rockström et al., 2009) - defined environmental limits for human civilization
- Cradle to Cradle design philosophy (McDonough & Braungart, 2002) - introduced circular economy principles
- Social-Ecological Systems framework (Ostrom, 1990) - showed how communities sustainably manage shared resources
- Integrated Assessment Models for climate mitigation (IPCC synthesis) - demonstrated pathways to net-zero emissions
Preparing a Sustainability Submission?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Sustainability and know exactly what editors look for.
Run Free Readiness ScanNeed expert depth? See Expert Review Options
Primary Fields
Related Journal Guides
- Publishing in Science
- Publishing in Science of The Total Environment
- Publishing in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publishing in Environmental Science & Technology
- Publishing in RNA
Latest Journal-Specific Guides
- Submission guideSustainability submission guideSubmitting to Sustainability? Learn article structure, formatting priorities, ethics and data requirements, and what editors want before they send a.
- Journal assessmentIs Sustainability a Good Journal? Fit VerdictA practical Sustainability fit verdict for authors deciding whether the manuscript has real systems, policy, or implementation value.
- Desk rejectionHow to Avoid Desk Rejection at SustainabilityHow to avoid desk rejection at Sustainability by proving systems thinking, solution pathways, and real implementation logic.
- Review timelineSustainability Review Time 2026: What Authors Can Actually ExpectSustainability often reaches a first decision in about 2-6 weeks. Here is the real review timeline, what drives delays, and how to decide fit.
More Guides for This Journal
- Acceptance rateSustainability Acceptance Rate 2026: How Hard Is It to Get Published?Sustainability accepts around 35-45% of submissions - accessible but not a rubber stamp. Here's what the review process looks like and what editors actually screen for.
- Impact factorSustainability (MDPI) Impact Factor 2026: 3.3Sustainability (MDPI) impact factor is 3.3 (JCR 2024). Q2, rank 80/191. 103,000+ papers. APC $2,382. See the trend and honest assessment.
- Publishing costsSustainability (MDPI) APC and Open Access: High Volume, Higher Price, and What You're Actually Paying ForSustainability (MDPI) charges CHF 2,600 (~$2,800) for gold open access. MDPI discount schemes, vouchers, and how it compares to J. Cleaner Production.
- Submission processSustainability submission processSustainability submission process. Practical guidance for Sustainability, plus what authors should do next. See the full timeline from upload.
- Manuscript prepSustainability Cover Letter: What Editors Actually Need to SeeSustainability publishes across an enormous range of topics. A cover letter that names the right section and states a concrete sustainability finding is the fastest way through triage.
- Publishing guideIs Sustainability (MDPI) Predatory? A Practical VerdictSustainability is not predatory by standard definitions. It has a 3.3 Impact Factor and dual SCIE/SSCI indexing - but Norway removed it from approved lists and Finland downgraded it to Level 0.
Ready to submit to Sustainability?
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Sustainability editors look for.
Avoid Desk Rejection
Get expert pre-submission review before you submit to Sustainability. 3-7 day turnaround.
Manuscript Rejected?
Expert revision help to strengthen your manuscript and resubmit with confidence.
Reviewer Response Help
Get expert guidance crafting your response to Sustainability reviewers.
Reference library
Compare Sustainability with the broader publishing context
This journal guide is the best starting point for Sustainability. The reference library covers the surrounding questions authors usually ask next: whether the package is ready, what drives desk rejection, how neighboring journals compare, and what the submission constraints look like across the field.
Checklist system / operational asset
Elite Submission Checklist
A flagship pre-submission checklist that turns journal-fit, desk-reject, and package-quality lessons into one operational final-pass audit.
Flagship report / decision support
Desk Rejection Report
A canonical desk-rejection report that organizes the most common editorial failure modes, what they look like, and how to prevent them.
Dataset / reference hub
Journal Intelligence Dataset
A canonical journal dataset that combines selectivity posture, review timing, submission requirements, and Manusights fit signals in one citeable reference asset.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Need field-expert depth? See Expert Review Options