Journal Guides10 min read•Updated Mar 16, 2026

Allergy Submission Guide: Requirements & Editorial Fit

Practical Allergy submission guide: scope, ScholarOne setup, and what editors look for before review.

By ManuSights Team•March 16, 2026

Readiness scan

Find out if this manuscript is ready to submit.

Run the Free Readiness Scan before you submit. Catch the issues editors reject on first read.

Run Free Readiness ScanAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Open Journal Fit Checklist

Stage	What to check
1. Scope	Define the allergic-disease use case
2. Package	Clarify clinical versus mechanistic contribution
3. Cover letter	Stress patient or practice relevance
4. Final check	Position against nearby allergy journals

Decision cue: If you need to submit to Allergy today, verify that the paper matches the journal's clinical-translational focus and is written for a specialist allergy audience rather than a broad immunology audience.

This Allergy submission guide walks through what you actually need to check before submitting, from scope verification to portal setup. The point is not just to clear the technical upload steps but to make sure the manuscript reads like a paper the editors would want to send to review.

Quick Answer: Allergy Journal Submission Overview

Allergy accepts original research, reviews, and clinical studies in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology. The journal uses Wiley's ScholarOne manuscript submission portal. Original articles need a tight, clinically relevant package rather than a sprawling immunology manuscript.

Editorial screening is usually quick. Scope mismatches and thin translational framing tend to stop a submission before full review. Papers that do fit typically move into specialist peer review rather than sitting in editorial limbo for long.

Allergy Journal Scope and Article Types

Allergy focuses on clinical and translational research in allergic diseases, asthma, and immunology. They want papers that advance understanding of allergic mechanisms or improve patient care.

Original research articles form the core content. Clinical studies examining new treatments, diagnostic approaches, or disease mechanisms get priority. Basic science papers need clear clinical relevance. Population studies and epidemiological research that inform clinical practice also fit well.

Clinical trials require CONSORT reporting guidelines. Phase II and III trials get preference over early-phase studies. Real-world evidence studies and pragmatic trials align with the journal's clinical focus.

Reviews and meta-analyses should synthesize recent advances or controversial topics in allergy practice. Systematic reviews following PRISMA guidelines work better than narrative reviews. The editors want reviews that help clinicians make decisions, not just summarize literature.

Brief communications report preliminary findings or novel observations. These run under 1,500 words and need immediate clinical relevance. Case series with new insights about rare allergic conditions sometimes work here.

Letters to the editor respond to published articles or report interesting cases. Keep these under 500 words with one figure maximum.

The journal won't consider basic immunology papers without clear allergy connections. Food chemistry studies without clinical endpoints don't fit. Animal model papers need strong translational components to get past desk review.

Step-by-Step Submission Process

Allergy uses Wiley's ScholarOne manuscript submission system. You'll need to create an account if you don't have one already. The portal handles submissions for multiple Wiley journals, so your login works across their platform.

Before you start uploading:

Prepare your cover letter first. You'll paste this into a text box during submission, not upload it as a file. Have your manuscript saved as a Word document with figures embedded at appropriate locations. Separate high-resolution figure files aren't required at initial submission but help during production if accepted.

ScholarOne submission steps:

Log into ScholarOne and select "Author Center." Click "Submit a New Manuscript" and choose Allergy from the journal list. The system walks through six main sections.

Manuscript type and details: Select your article type from the dropdown menu. Original Article covers most research papers. Enter your title exactly as it appears in your manuscript. The system generates a manuscript ID that you'll use for all correspondence.

Authors and institutions: Add all authors in order. Include full names, affiliations, and email addresses. Designate one corresponding author who'll receive all editorial communications. The system requires ORCID IDs for corresponding authors.

Abstract and keywords: Paste your structured abstract into the text box. Select 4-6 keywords from the provided list. The system suggests keywords based on your abstract content. Choose terms that match your research focus precisely.

File upload: Upload your main manuscript file first. The system accepts Word documents and PDFs, but Word works better for editorial review. Upload figures as separate files if they're not embedded in the manuscript. Tables can stay in the main document.

Review preferences: You can suggest reviewers or request to exclude specific individuals. Provide brief justifications for your suggestions. The editors appreciate good reviewer suggestions but aren't bound by them.

Final validation: Review all entered information before submission. The system flags missing required fields. Once submitted, you can't modify the manuscript without editorial permission.

The system sends a confirmation email with your manuscript ID within minutes. Use this ID for all future correspondence about your submission.

Formatting Requirements and Common Mistakes

Original articles can't exceed 4,000 words excluding references, figure legends, and supplementary material. Count everything from the introduction through discussion. The system flags overlong manuscripts during submission.

Manuscript structure follows standard format:

Title page includes full title, all authors with affiliations, corresponding author contact details, and word count. Don't put acknowledgments or funding information on the title page.

Abstract stays under 250 words with clear background, methods, results, and conclusions sections. Avoid citations in abstracts except for methodology papers referencing established protocols.

Main text uses standard headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion. Combine Results and Discussion if it improves flow. Methods should include enough detail for replication without excessive length.

Reference formatting follows standard citation style:

Journal articles: Author(s). Title. Journal Year; Volume: pages. Include DOI when available. Book chapters need editor names, book titles, publisher, and page ranges. Web sources require access dates.

Figure requirements:

Submit figures at 300 DPI minimum resolution. JPEG works for photographs, TIFF for line drawings. Label panels as A, B, C in order of appearance. Figure legends go in the main manuscript file, not as separate captions.

Common formatting mistakes that trigger desk rejection:

Exceeding word limits gets automatic rejection. Missing ethics statements for human or animal studies stops review immediately. Incomplete author information or missing conflict of interest declarations also cause delays.

Poor figure quality forces editorial rejection before peer review. Blurry images, pixelated graphs, or unreadable text labels won't work. The production team can't fix fundamental image problems.

Reference formatting errors slow review but don't usually cause rejection. Still, clean references suggest attention to detail that editors notice.

Cover Letter Template for Allergy

Your cover letter should explain why Allergy is the right venue for your research and highlight your main findings without repeating the abstract.

Opening paragraph: State your manuscript title and article type. Mention why your research fits Allergy's scope specifically.

"We submit our original research article 'Novel biomarkers predict asthma exacerbations in children' for consideration by Allergy. This prospective cohort study identifies serum proteins that predict severe exacerbations 30 days before symptom onset, directly addressing Allergy's focus on clinically relevant biomarker research."

Main findings paragraph: Highlight your most important results without copying abstract language. Focus on clinical implications and novel contributions.

Methodology confidence: Briefly mention study design strengths, sample size justification, or statistical approaches that ensure result validity. Don't repeat detailed methods here.

Significance statement: Explain how your findings advance allergy practice or understanding. Be specific about clinical applications or research directions your work enables.

Closing: Confirm all authors approve submission and have no competing interests that weren't disclosed. State that the work hasn't been published elsewhere and isn't under review at other journals.

Keep the entire letter under 300 words. Editors read hundreds of cover letters monthly. Clear, direct language works better than elaborate descriptions. For detailed cover letter examples and templates, see our Journal Cover Letter Template: 5 Filled-In Examples for Any Journal (2026).

Review Timeline and What to Expect

Initial editorial screening takes 1-2 weeks. The editors check scope fit, formatting compliance, and basic scientific soundness. About 30-40% of submissions get desk rejected at this stage for scope mismatches or insufficient clinical relevance.

Manuscripts that pass initial screening go to peer review. The editorial office invites 2-3 reviewers per paper. Reviewer response times vary, but the system sends automatic reminders after two weeks.

Typical timeline breakdown:

Week 1-2: Editorial screening and reviewer invitations

Week 3-8: Peer review period

Week 9-12: Editorial decision compilation and communication

Some manuscripts get decisions faster when reviewers respond quickly or when rejection seems clear. Complex papers or those requiring additional editorial consultation can take longer.

Decision types you might receive:

Accept without revision (rare, maybe 5% of accepted papers). Minor revision requiring small changes and author responses to reviewer comments. Major revision needing additional experiments or substantial manuscript changes. Reject with encouragement to submit elsewhere.

The editorial office sends detailed reviewer comments with all decisions except outright rejections. Response letters should address every reviewer concern systematically, even when you disagree with specific points.

Revised manuscripts typically get expedited review, often returning to the same reviewers. Second-round decisions usually come within 4-6 weeks of resubmission.

Acceptance Rate and Editorial Decision Process

Allergy accepts approximately 25-30% of submitted manuscripts, though this varies significantly by article type. Original research articles face the most competition. Review articles have slightly higher acceptance rates when they address timely topics.

Editorial screening focuses on scope alignment first. Papers studying non-allergic conditions or basic immunology without clear clinical connections get rejected quickly. The editors want research that advances understanding of allergic diseases or improves patient outcomes.

Scientific quality assessment comes second. Inadequate sample sizes, flawed statistical analyses, or overclaimed conclusions trigger rejection. Clinical studies without proper controls or population studies with selection bias don't pass editorial review.

Novelty and significance influence final decisions. Incremental findings that confirm known relationships struggle for acceptance. Papers reporting new mechanisms, novel therapeutic approaches, or important negative results get more consideration.

Common reasons for desk rejection:

Scope mismatch represents the biggest category. Studies of general respiratory conditions, infectious diseases, or basic immunology without allergy connections don't fit. Animal model papers lacking translational components also get rejected.

Methodological flaws that can't be fixed in revision lead to rejection. Retrospective studies with inadequate controls, clinical trials without proper randomization, or laboratory studies with insufficient sample sizes won't get peer review.

Poor presentation quality suggests deeper problems. Manuscripts with unclear objectives, disorganized methods sections, or results that don't support conclusions get rejected before peer review.

The editors appreciate well-designed studies that address clinically important questions in allergy practice. Papers that help clinicians make better decisions or reveal new therapeutic targets have the best acceptance chances.

ScholarOne Manuscripts workflow and file-preparation guidance
Recent Allergy research articles and article-format expectations
Manusights editorial synthesis based on common allergy-journal fit and review patterns

Quick Answer: Allergy Journal Submission Overview Allergy Journal Scope and Article Types Step-by-Step Submission Process Formatting Requirements and Common Mistakes Cover Letter Template for Allergy Review Timeline and What to Expect