Journal Guide
Sensors Impact Factor 3.5: Publishing Guide
Sensor technology: detecting molecules, signals, and environmental change
3.5
Impact Factor (2024)
~50-60%
Acceptance Rate
~60-80 days median
Time to First Decision
What Sensors Publishes
Sensors published by MDPI is an open-access journal covering sensor technologies across disciplines. With JIF 3.5 and broad coverage in Chemistry, Physics, and Engineering, Sensors emphasizes research on novel sensing approaches, sensor materials, and sensing applications. The journal publishes diverse sensor research from chemical sensors through physical sensors to biosensors. Critically: Sensors values practical sensing applications. Pure material science or detection method development without demonstration in sensor context is less competitive. The journal seeks papers showing how innovations enable new sensing capabilities.
- Chemical sensors: electrochemical, optical, piezoelectric detection
- Biosensors: biomarker detection, DNA/protein sensing, immunosensors
- Environmental sensors: pollutant monitoring, air/water quality
- Physical sensors: temperature, pressure, strain, motion detection
- Smart materials for sensing: responsive polymers, nanostructures
- Optical sensors: fluorescence, absorbance, surface plasmon resonance
- Sensor signal processing and data analysis
- Sensor applications in healthcare, environmental monitoring, IoT
Editor Insight
“Sensors publishes research advancing sensor technology and applications. We seek novel sensing platforms with demonstrated real-world applicability. Pure material science without sensor application is less competitive. The best papers combine novel sensing approach with practical demonstration.”
What Sensors Editors Look For
Novel sensing platform or approach with demonstrated detection capability
Present sensing method detecting target analyte with clear advantages over existing approaches. Show sensitivity, selectivity, response time. Quantify detection limits and dynamic range. Demonstrate practical sensing application.
Complete sensor characterization under realistic conditions
Test sensor in relevant matrices: blood serum for biomarkers, wastewater for pollutants, air samples for gases. Real-world conditions reveal sensor reliability. Lab-only testing in pure solutions is weak.
Understanding of sensing mechanism and signal generation
Explain how your sensor works. What's the transduction mechanism? How do chemical/physical changes generate detectable signal? Mechanistic understanding strengthens papers.
Reproducibility and practical sensor implementation
Show sensor fabrication reproducibility and describe implementation feasibility. Can others reproduce your sensor? Is fabrication scalable? Practical implementation matters.
Comparison with existing sensing approaches on performance metrics
Compare your sensor with state-of-the-art methods showing sensitivity, selectivity, cost, or ease-of-use advantages. Demonstrate clear performance improvement.
Why Papers Get Rejected
These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Sensors's editorial review:
Demonstrating analyte detection in pure solutions without real-sample testing
Detecting molecules in synthetic samples is easy. Real samples contain interfering substances. Test in biological samples, environmental samples, or other complex matrices.
Reporting sensitivity without selectivity data
Sensitivity alone is insufficient. Show selectivity: testing against interferents and related compounds. Selective detection is what makes sensors useful.
Sensor platform without demonstration of practical application
Novel sensing chemistry is interesting, but Sensors expects application demonstration. Show actual disease diagnosis, pollutant monitoring, or other real-world sensing context.
Ignoring sensor stability and shelf life
Practical sensors must remain stable during storage and use. Address stability, shelf life, and environmental tolerance. Degrading sensors have limited utility.
Lacking comparison with existing commercial or reported sensors
Show your sensor's competitive position. How does performance (sensitivity, selectivity, cost, response time) compare with existing sensors for the same analyte?
Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?
The quick diagnostic reads your full manuscript against Sensors's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.
Insider Tips from Sensors Authors
Wearable and point-of-care sensors have growing emphasis
Research on wearable biosensors, flexible sensors, or point-of-care diagnostic devices receives increasing editorial interest as mobile health grows.
Multiplexing and simultaneous multi-analyte detection valued
Sensors detecting multiple biomarkers simultaneously or multiple analyte classes are more impactful than single-analyte detection.
Integration with IoT and wireless transmission gaining importance
Smart sensors with connectivity, data processing, or wireless transmission demonstrating Internet of Things integration increasingly competitive.
Graphene and nanostructure-based sensors remain hot topics
Sensors using graphene, graphene oxide, or other nanostructures for enhanced sensitivity remain scientifically prominent.
Lateral flow and paper-based sensors for low-resource settings valued
Sensors suitable for resource-limited environments or developing regions receive increasing attention for global health applications.
The Sensors Submission Process
Manuscript preparation
Prep5,000-8,000 words with 5-7 figures. Include sensor fabrication, characterization, sensitivity/selectivity data in real samples, comparison with existing sensors, and practical application demonstration. Supporting: additional performance data, sensor images.
Submission via MDPI system
Day 0Submit at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors/submit. Required: manuscript emphasizing sensing novelty and practical application, figures showing sensor response and selectivity, cover letter highlighting performance advantages.
Editorial assessment
1-2 weeksEditor assesses sensing novelty, performance significance, and practical applicability. Papers lacking real-sample testing or practical application may face lower priority. Moderate desk rejection ~15-25%.
Peer review
60-80 days2 reviewers assess sensor design, characterization rigor, and practical significance. First decision 60-80 days.
Revision and publication
Revision: 2-4 weeksRevisions often request real-sample validation or comparison with existing sensors. Quick revision. Publication 1-3 weeks after acceptance.
Sensors by the Numbers
| 2024 Impact Factor | 3.9 |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 4.2 |
| Acceptance rate | ~50-60% |
| Desk rejection rate | ~15-25% |
| Median first decision | ~70 days |
| Open access APC | ~$2,100 CHF |
| Publisher | MDPI |
| Founded | 2001 |
Before you submit
Sensors accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.
The pre-submission diagnostic runs a live literature search, scores your manuscript section by section, and gives you a prioritized fix list calibrated to Sensors. ~30 minutes.
Article Types
Article
5,000-8,000 wordsNovel sensor development and application
Review
7,000-12,000 wordsSensor technology topic review
Short Note
2,500-4,000 wordsBrief sensor finding
Landmark Sensors Papers
Papers that defined fields and changed science:
- Electrochemical sensors development (1970s+) - continuous sensing foundation
- Surface plasmon resonance biosensors (1990s+) - label-free real-time detection
- Glucose biosensor (many variants) - enabled diabetes management
- DNA biosensors and nanosensors (2000s+) - molecular-level detection
- Wearable sensors boom (2010s+) - health monitoring revolution
Preparing a Sensors Submission?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Sensors and know exactly what editors look for.
Run Free Readiness ScanNeed expert depth? Human review from $1,000
Primary Fields
Related Journal Guides
All journal guidesRelated Articles
- Desk Rejection: What It Means, Why It Happens, and What to Do Next
- How to Respond to Reviewer Comments (Without Losing Your Mind)
- How to Choose the Right Journal for Your Paper (A Practical Guide)
- Pre-Submission Scientific Review: What It Costs, When It Works, and When to Skip It
Ready to submit to Sensors?
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Sensors editors look for.
Avoid Desk Rejection
Get expert pre-submission review before you submit to Sensors. 3-7 day turnaround.
Manuscript Rejected?
Expert revision help to strengthen your manuscript and resubmit with confidence.
Reviewer Response Help
Get expert guidance crafting your response to Sensors reviewers.
Need field-expert depth? Human review from $1,000