Astronomy Astrophysics Formatting Requirements: A&A Guide
Astronomy & Astrophysics sets page caps instead of a word limit (12 main-body pages for a regular paper, 4 for a Letter) with page charges beyond the cap. LaTeX with the aa.cls class is required, and references use an author-year style without article titles.
Readiness scan
Formatting done? See what Astronomy & Astrophysics reviewers are likely to push back on.
Formatting gets a paper past the technical check, not past the editor. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Astronomy & Astrophysics as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.
Quick answer: Astronomy Astrophysics formatting requirements are mostly A&A-specific LaTeX and astronomy-convention checks. A&A expects the aa.cls class, author-year references, keywords from a controlled list, an abstract of at most 300 words (a structured abstract is encouraged), and figures/tables that work in the journal's two-column format.
Regular articles have no word limit, but length still matters because page charges apply above the page cap.
Method note: this page was reviewed against A&A author information, the A&A author guide PDF, A&A language-editing guidance, the local Astronomy & Astrophysics journal hub, and Manusights pre-submission review patterns for astronomy manuscripts. For acceptance-rate, review-time, and cover-letter questions, see the Astronomy & Astrophysics submission guide and submission process pages.
A&A doesn't set a word limit for regular articles; it caps length in pages (12 main-body pages and 8 appendix pages for a regular paper, 4 main-body pages for a Letter). LaTeX is required, using the aa.cls document class. References use the A&A author-year style. Page charges apply above the page cap, and first authors from non-sponsoring countries also pay per page within it. A&A discontinued Research Notes in 2016.
Word Limits by Article Type
A&A uses page-based conventions rather than word counts. The page charge system provides a practical incentive for concise writing.
Article Type | Word Count / Length Limit | Abstract | Figures | Page Charges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Regular Article | 12-page main-body cap and 8-page appendix cap | 300 words (aa.cls limit) | No published cap | Free within the caps for sponsoring-country first authors; otherwise EUR 100 to 200 per page |
Letter to the Editor | 4 main-body pages (strict) and 5-page appendix cap | 300 words (aa.cls limit) | No published cap | Free within the caps for sponsoring-country first authors; otherwise EUR 100 to 200 per page |
Review article | No published limit | 300 words (aa.cls limit) | No published cap | No separate schedule published |
Length limits are page-based. The manuscript's page count is established at the time of submission, very long lists of authors and affiliations are not included in the 12-page (or 4-page, as applicable) limit, and appendix pages count against their own cap.
Regular Articles make up the bulk of A&A's content. While there's no word limit, a regular paper has a 12-page main-body cap and an 8-page appendix cap, and pages above the caps incur page charges (EUR 150 to 200 per page). The extra fees are charged to the first author's institution, or to the corresponding author when authors are listed alphabetically. The word count that fits depends on how many figures and tables the paper has, so count pages rather than words.
Letters to the Editor are the rapid publication format for urgent results. The 4-page limit on the main body (from the main title to the references) is strict, and Letters are expected to present complete findings that stand on their own. They aren't preliminary reports.
A&A discontinued its Research Notes category in 2016, so there is no Research Note category to submit to.
Abstract Requirements
A&A has specific abstract formatting rules that differ from most journals.
- Word limit: 300 words; the aa.cls class shows an error message for an abstract over 300 words
- Structure: Structured abstracts are encouraged but not mandatory
- Mandatory paragraphs if you use a structured abstract: Aims, Methods, and Results (Context and Conclusions are optional)
A&A encourages a structured abstract, which uses headings that define several short paragraphs. If you use one, Aims, Methods and Results are mandatory, and you may add an introductory Context paragraph and a final Conclusions paragraph. Authors who prefer the traditional form are asked to follow the same logical structure implicitly. The abstract should be self-contained: no references, and abbreviations or acronyms should be introduced. The elements, in order:
- Context: Background and motivation (optional heading)
- Aims: What the paper sets out to do (mandatory heading)
- Methods: How it was done (mandatory heading)
- Results: What was found, with quantitative data (mandatory heading)
- Conclusions: What it means (optional heading)
The structured abstract is an encouraged convention rather than a requirement, so a traditional abstract that follows the same logic is acceptable.
Figure Specifications
A&A has detailed figure requirements. Figures are a major component of most astronomy papers.
Figure formatting requirements:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
File formats | eps, pdf, jpg, png and tiff, or native Photoshop/Illustrator files |
Resolution | At least 250/300 dpi for bitmap formats (not 92 dpi screen resolution) |
Colors | Background grids and colors are not allowed unless they contain additional information; avoid combining red and green |
Single column width | 8.8 cm (88 mm) |
Full page width | Up to 18.0 cm (180 mm); intermediate widths with a side caption up to 12 cm |
Lettering | Clean, clear numbers and letters, sharp black lines, no thin lines; lower case for words in figures |
Panel labels | Label lettered parts (a, b, c) inside the image when the legend refers to them; otherwise refer to panels by position |
Color: The guide does not allow background grids and colors in figures unless they contain additional information, and it asks authors to avoid combining red and green because color-blind readers cannot distinguish them. It also asks authors to check whether laser-printed originals of figures are acceptable, especially for grayscale. Use distinct line styles (solid, dashed, dotted) in addition to colors, and avoid relying on color alone to distinguish data series.
Astronomical imaging conventions: Sky images should follow the IAU convention (north up, east left). Coordinate axes should use standard astronomical notation (Right Ascension in hours/minutes/seconds, Declination in degrees/arcminutes/arcseconds). Spectral plots should clearly label wavelength or frequency units.
Table formatting: A&A uses its own table formatting through LaTeX. Use the table environment. Every column, including the first, needs a heading. Units go in parentheses immediately below the column headings, the caption goes above the table, and a table including its caption usually must not exceed 23.5 cm in height. For large tables of primary data, A&A archives the data at the CDS (the Strasbourg astronomical data center, which hosts VizieR).
Reference Format: A&A Author-Year Style
A&A uses a distinctive author-year citation style that differs from both the AAS (ApJ) system and the standard astronomy citation formats.
In-text citations:
- Single author: Author (Year) or (Author Year)
- Two authors: Author1 & Author2 (Year) or (Author1 & Author2 Year)
- Three or more: Author1 et al. (Year) or (Author1 et al. Year)
Reference list format:
The reference list is alphabetical by first author's last name.
Author, A. B., Author, C. D., & Author, E. F. Year, Journal Abbreviation, Volume, PageKey formatting details:
- Author names: Last name, initials (with periods)
- Ampersand before last author
- Year follows author list
- Journal abbreviation follows A&A conventions (A&A, ApJ, MNRAS, etc.)
- Volume number follows journal abbreviation
- Article or page number (e.g., A23 for A&A articles)
- No title in the reference (this is a key difference from many journals)
Worked example:
Zhang, Y., Chen, L., & Patel, W. R. 2026, A&A, 689, A145Note: no article title. A&A references for journal articles don't include the article title. This is one of the most distinctive features of the A&A reference format. Book references do include titles, but journal articles do not. This catches authors coming from journals that require titles in all references.
The natbib package, used with aa.cls, handles the citation formatting automatically. Use \citet{} for textual citations and \citep{} for parenthetical citations.
LaTeX: Required in Practice
A&A requires manuscripts to be formatted in LaTeX2e using the current A&A macro package, which includes the aa.cls document class. There is no Word option.
LaTeX setup:
- Document class:
\documentclass{aa}(using the aa.cls file)
- Download the latest A&A macro package, including aa.cls, from the A&A LaTeX instructions
- The package includes aa.cls, aa.bst (bibliography style), and a template file
- Use natbib for citations:
\usepackage{natbib}
- Use standard astronomy packages: astropy, aastex_hack isn't needed since you're using aa.cls
Key aa.cls features:
- Handles the two-column layout automatically
- Provides
\abstract{}with Context, Aims, Methods, Results, Conclusions support
- Includes
\keywords{}for keyword specification
- Provides
\corrauthand\emailfor author e-mail addresses (class update, March 2026)
Essential tip: Don't modify the aa.cls file. The guide warns that using aa.cls with other versions or implementations may cause difficulties, and it asks authors not to use self-made definitions because they get lost during conversion. If you need custom formatting, use standard LaTeX commands within the aa.cls framework.
A&A-Specific Formatting Quirks
No article titles in references. This is the single most common formatting error from first-time A&A authors. Journal article references in the A&A style do not include the article title. Only book references, proceedings, and theses include titles. The aa.bst bibliography style handles this automatically if your.bib file is properly formatted.
Page charges for long papers. Pages above the caps (12 main-body pages and 8 appendix pages for a regular paper) incur page charges of EUR 150 to 200 per page, and first authors from non-sponsoring countries also pay per page within the cap. Plan your paper length accordingly. Large tables of primary data can be archived at the CDS.
Appendices are camera-ready. From July 2021, A&A does not typeset appendix pages and includes them at the end of the article as camera-ready material. No correction, copyediting or layout change is made after the publisher receives the accepted version, so prepare appendices carefully.
Keywords from a controlled list. A&A allows a maximum of 6 key words, selected from a list common to the major astronomical and astrophysical journals. You can't use free-form keywords. Check the list on the A&A website before selecting your keywords.
Astronomical object names. A&A links the most important objects in an article to the Simbad or NED databases with the \object{} directive. The guide says the number of such links should not exceed some 10-20 occurrences and that the directive should be avoided in tabular material, so tag only the objects the article studies.
CDS data deposit. A&A makes it mandatory to publish the data presented and discussed in an article and needed to reproduce the results, usually at the Centre de Donnees astronomiques de Strasbourg (CDS), immediately upon acceptance. The CDS requires data tables in ASCII format with a ReadMe file, and primary data can also be archived as FITS files. If the primary observational data are already archived at a public facility such as ESO or HST, only the reduced data are archived.
Language editing. A&A sends papers to language editors after acceptance, at the recommendation of the referee or one of the editors, and not all papers are looked at by a language editor. The guide holds the authors responsible for a correct formulation of their text.
Section numbering. A&A uses numbered sections. The standard structure is: 1. Introduction, 2. Observations/Methods, 3. Results, 4. Discussion, 5. Conclusions. Follow the numbering convention.
Manuscript Structure for Regular Articles
A standard A&A Regular Article follows this structure:
Order | Section | Note |
|---|---|---|
1 | Title | Descriptive, specific to the astronomical topic |
2 | Author names and affiliations | Using the aa.cls affiliation system |
3 | Abstract | Structured abstract encouraged (Aims, Methods, Results mandatory if used); 300 words maximum |
4 | Keywords | Maximum of 6, from the A&A controlled keyword list |
5 | 1. Introduction | |
6 | 2. Observations and Data Reduction | Or Methods/Theory |
7 | 3. Results | |
8 | 4. Discussion | |
9 | 5. Conclusions | |
10 | Acknowledgements | |
11 | References | Alphabetical, no article titles |
12 | Appendices | Optional |
13 | Data tables at the CDS | If applicable |
The structure is flexible within this framework. Observational papers might combine Observations and Results. Theoretical papers might have a Theory section. Instrumentation papers will have their own appropriate structure.
Common Mistakes That Auto-Formatters Miss
BibTeX with the aa.bst style and natbib gets the punctuation right but won't catch the A&A-specific conventions, and exceeding the page allowance is a cost, not an error your editor flags. These cause the most delays at A&A:
- Including article titles in journal references (A&A style omits them; a default BibTeX
.bstthat isn't aa.bst will add them back)
- Not using the aa.cls document class
- Using free-form keywords instead of the A&A controlled list
- Exceeding the page caps (12 main-body pages and 8 appendix pages for a regular paper) without budgeting for page charges
- Background grids or colors in figures that carry no information, or red-green combinations that color-blind readers cannot tell apart
- Non-standard astronomical object names that don't link to SIMBAD
- Using AAS or MNRAS citation format instead of A&A style
- Using a structured abstract without the mandatory Aims, Methods and Results paragraphs
- Bitmap figures below 250/300 dpi
Related guides and resources
For more on this journal, see our Astronomy & Astrophysics submission guide, Astronomy & Astrophysics submission process, and Astronomy & Astrophysics cover letter guide.
For the official author guidelines and the aa.cls download, visit the A&A information for authors.
What This Means Before Submission
Treat A&A formatting as part of the scientific package. The aa.cls file, structured abstract, reference style, controlled keywords, figure formats, and page-length economics all tell editors whether the manuscript was prepared for this journal rather than transferred from ApJ, MNRAS, or a generic astronomy template.
This guide was last verified against the A&A author guidelines on October 9, 2026; the A&A author pages and the aa.cls package were last revised in 2026 (the page-length policy applies from 2 April 2025, and the class was updated in March 2026), so re-check the live A&A author page for any version change before you submit.
Get Your Formatting Right Before You Submit
A&A has one of the most distinctive formatting systems among major scientific journals. The aa.cls document class, the reference style without article titles, the controlled keyword list, the page charge system, and the online-only material conventions are all unique to this journal. Coming from ApJ, MNRAS, or non-astronomy journals, you'll need to adjust multiple formatting elements.
If you'd like to check your manuscript against A&A's formatting requirements, Astronomy & Astrophysics formatting and readiness check. It catches the formatting and structural issues that lead to administrative returns, saving you time on revision.
A&A Formatting vs Other Astrophysics Journals
The conventions you carry over from ApJ or MNRAS will not all transfer. This cross-journal table shows where A&A differs on the axes that cause the most reformatting.
Axis | A&A | ApJ | MNRAS |
|---|---|---|---|
LaTeX class | aa.cls (provided) | aastex (AASTeX) | mnras.cls (provided by RAS) |
Reference style | Author-year, no article title | Author-year, with title | Author-year, with title |
Abstract | Structured abstract encouraged (Aims/Methods/Results mandatory if used) | Single paragraph | Single paragraph |
Figure color | Background colors only if they carry information; avoid red with green | Charged in some cases | Free online |
Word count / length | Page-based: 12 main-body pages (4 for Letters), page charges beyond the cap | No fixed limit | No fixed limit |
Source: A&A (EDP Sciences), AAS, and RAS author guidelines, accessed June 2026.
Each journal has its own class file. Do not submit an ApJ-formatted paper to A&A or vice versa. The formatting differences are not trivial, and desk rejection for the wrong template is common.
What Pre-Submission Reviews Reveal About Astronomy & Astrophysics Submissions
For manuscripts targeting Astronomy & Astrophysics, four patterns generate the most consistent desk-rejection outcomes.
A&A LaTeX class (aa.cls) not used. The journal requires the aa.cls macro package, available from the A&A website. Papers formatted in AASTeX (the ApJ/AJ standard) or with a generic LaTeX article class are returned before peer review. The confusion between aa.cls and aastex is the single most common administrative return at A&A: the two packages produce visually similar output, but reviewers and editors can identify the wrong class file from the typesetting conventions and header format.
Observational data not deposited or referenced in CDS/VizieR. A&A makes it mandatory to publish the data needed to reproduce the results, usually at the Strasbourg CDS, and the text should refer to the material published electronically. Papers reporting astrometric catalogues, photometric survey data, or spectral line lists without CDS submission are asked to complete the deposit upon acceptance.
Incremental result submitted as a Regular Article. A&A discontinued its Research Notes category in 2016, so a single novel result or incremental follow-up has no short category of its own. Incremental or confirmatory results submitted as Regular Articles are flagged at editorial triage; the editor will typically reject for scope.
Statistical reporting inconsistent with astronomical community standards. A&A applies community norms for uncertainty reporting: symmetric and asymmetric error bars, upper limit conventions, Bayesian credible intervals vs. frequentist confidence intervals, and completeness corrections for survey-based results. Papers reporting detection significance without false-alarm probability analysis, or photometric fits without explicit uncertainty propagation, are sent back for methodological revision before the science is assessed, and in our review work this is the failure that most often survives an otherwise clean aa.cls compile.
A Astronomy & Astrophysics submission readiness check evaluates manuscript structure, LaTeX template compliance, and data availability against these desk-rejection patterns before submission.
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
Submit If / Think Twice If
Submit if:
- Your manuscript is prepared using aa.cls (not aastex or a generic article class)
- Observational data tables have been deposited in CDS/VizieR with an accession reference
- Statistical uncertainties are reported according to astronomical community conventions
- Your scope is a full investigation warranting a Regular Article (not a 1-2 result note)
- See the Astronomy & Astrophysics journal profile for scope
Think twice if:
- Your LaTeX file uses aastex or no journal class file (re-format before submitting)
- You have survey or catalogue data that has not been submitted to CDS
- Your result is confirmatory or incremental (A&A discontinued Research Notes in 2016, so a short result has no separate category)
- Your uncertainty analysis does not follow standard astronomical error-bar conventions
For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run an Astronomy Astrophysics submission readiness check.
Or see example reports before you finalize.
Frequently asked questions
A&A does not set a word limit. Length is capped in pages: a regular paper has a 12-page main-body cap and an 8-page appendix cap, and a Letter has a strict 4-page main body (from the title to the references) and a 5-page appendix cap. Pages above the caps carry page charges of EUR 150 to 200 per page. The page count is established at submission, and very long lists of authors and affiliations are not counted.
Yes. A&A requires manuscripts to be written in English and formatted in LaTeX2e using the current A&A macro package, which includes the aa.cls document class. Submissions and manuscript follow-up are made through the A&A Nestor submission system.
A&A uses its own author-year citation style. In-text citations put the name(s) and year in parentheses without a comma, for example (Copernicus 1986), or Galilei et al. (1991) in running text. The reference list is alphabetical by surname with initials following. The A&A package includes the aa.bst style file, and the journal encourages BibTeX with the natbib package.
Page charges apply under a policy for papers submitted from 2 April 2025. First authors from sponsoring countries pay nothing within the page cap (12 main-body pages and 8 appendix pages for a regular paper, 4 and 5 for a Letter) and EUR 150 per page above it. First authors from non-sponsoring countries pay EUR 100 to 150 per page within the cap and EUR 150 to 200 per page above it. Charges are waived for first authors in Research4Life Group A countries.
A&A accepts graphics in eps, pdf, jpg, png and tiff formats, or as native Photoshop or Illustrator files. For bitmap formats, check that the resolution is at least 250/300 dpi. The production office reduces most figures to a one-column width of 88 mm, and figures may extend across the page width (maximum 180 mm). Background grids and colors are not allowed in figures unless they contain additional information.
Sources
- Astronomy & Astrophysics, author guidelines, EDP Sciences.
- A&A author's guide PDF, EDP Sciences.
- Clarivate Journal Citation Reports.
- A&A LaTeX macro package, EDP Sciences.
- SciRev - Astronomy and Astrophysics
Free guide
Formatting is the cheapest reason to get desk rejected.
An editor can reject your paper before a reviewer ever opens it, and the reasons are almost always fixable in an afternoon. This is the checklist of what gets checked first, and what to do about each one.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
Put the guidance to work
Choose the practical next step for your research.
Start with the question in front of you, or use the guided learning path when you want a clearer view of the full publishing process.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Astronomy and Astrophysics Submission Guide: How to Submit to A&A (EDP Sciences)
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Is Astronomy & Astrophysics a Good Journal? Impact, Scope, and Fit
- Rejected from Astronomy & Astrophysics? The 7 Best Journals to Submit Next
- Astronomy & Astrophysics Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- Is Your Paper Ready for Astronomy & Astrophysics? The European Astrophysics Standard