Cell Metabolism SJR and Scopus Metrics: What the Numbers Actually Tell Authors
Cell Metabolism sits at the top of metabolism research in both JCR and Scopus. The useful question is whether your manuscript is really field-defining enough for that tier.
Assistant Professor, Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disease
Author context
Works across cardiovascular biology and metabolic disease, with expertise in navigating high-impact journal submission requirements for Circulation, JACC, and European Heart Journal.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Cell Metabolism remains one of the strongest specialist journals in metabolism under Scopus-style metrics. Current Scopus-linked browser data reports a 2024 SJR of 11.989, a CiteScore of 45.5, and a rank of 2 out of 190 in Physiology. That confirms flagship status, but the submission decision still depends on whether your manuscript is truly field-defining enough for this room.
The core metric picture
Metric | 2024 value | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
SJR | 11.989 | Prestige-weighted influence is extremely strong |
CiteScore | 45.5 | Four-year citation performance is elite |
SNIP | 4.912 | Field-normalized impact is also high |
Rank | 2 / 190 in Physiology | The journal sits near the top of its field |
Quartile | Q1 | The journal remains firmly top-tier |
JCR context | Impact factor 30.9 | Web of Science tells the same flagship story |
The useful reading is that Cell Metabolism is not just a respected specialty journal. It is one of the main prestige-weighted destinations for metabolism papers.
What the metrics actually help with
They help explain the journal's place in the field:
- above most metabolism and endocrinology titles
- competitive with the strongest specialist flagships
- especially powerful when the paper joins mechanism, physiology, and disease consequence
That is useful when your manuscript sits between Cell Metabolism, Nature Metabolism, and a strong disease or physiology journal.
What the metrics do not answer
They do not tell you:
- whether the mechanism is closed enough
- whether the disease consequence is actually visible in the data
- whether the paper is too local in system or audience
- whether the story belongs in a narrower specialty venue
Those are still the real submission questions.
Why the profile matters for authors
At this SJR level, Cell Metabolism can be hard on papers that are interesting but not fully field-moving. The journal's profile reflects a specific editorial product:
- mechanism with system-level consequence
- metabolism that travels beyond one assay or organ niche
- disease relevance that shows up in the evidence, not only in the framing
- stories that change how the field explains physiology or metabolic disease
That is why the metrics are useful. They tell you the journal has enough authority to reject incomplete but exciting work.
What should drive the submission decision instead
The better question is whether the manuscript is really a Cell Metabolism paper.
That is why the better next reads are:
- Is Cell Metabolism a good journal?
- Cell Metabolism submission guide
- Cell Metabolism submission process
- Cell Metabolism acceptance rate
If the story is strong but still narrow, the metrics do not solve that. They only explain why the journal's editorial bar is so high.
Practical verdict
Cell Metabolism has a genuine flagship Scopus profile for metabolism research. That makes it a serious target when the manuscript is mechanistically complete, physiologically meaningful, and broad enough to matter across the field.
But the useful takeaway is still about fit, not prestige. If the paper is still one increment short, one disease claim too speculative, or one level too narrow, the metric is already warning you. A free Manusights scan is the fastest way to test that before submission.
- Is Cell Metabolism a good journal?, Manusights.
Sources
- 1. Cell Metabolism journal browser entry, Vrije Universiteit journal publishing guide.
- 2. Cell Metabolism journal page, Cell Press.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.