Skip to main content

Field Guide

Top Environment & Sustainability Journals

Journals for environmental engineering, sustainability, climate systems, and applied environmental science. This guide covers 13 journals with impact factors, acceptance rates, review timelines, and open access costs - everything you need to choose the right venue for your research.

13
Journals Covered
4
Elite / Top Tier
5
Strong Options
4
More Accessible

Journal Comparison Table

JournalTierImpact FactorAcceptance RateReview TimeOpen Access
Water Research
Water Res.
Top Tier12.813%7 days to first decisionSee details
Environmental Science & Technology
Environ. Sci. Technology
Top Tier12.2Not published by the journal48.2 days with review; 8.5 days without review (medians)See details
Journal of Hazardous Materials
J. Hazard. Mater.
Top Tier10.614%Not publicly verifiedSee details
Journal of HydrologyTop Tier7.317%Editorial screening firstSee details
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Strong Option1814%2 days to first decision (Elsevier Journal Finder, all first decisions incl. desk rejections)See details
Building and EnvironmentStrong Option8.414%Editorial screening first; peer review after editor fitSee details
Environmental ResearchStrong Option8.210%2 days submission to first decision on ScienceDirectSee details
Bioresource Technology
Bioresour. Technol.
Strong Option8.212%Not publicly verifiedSee details
Science of The Total Environment
Sci. Total Environment
Strong Option8.016%~60 days to first decisionSee details
RSC Advances
RSC Adv.
Accessible6.1Not published by the journal17 days median to first decision; 27 days after reviewSee details
Frontiers in Plant Science
Front. Plant Sci.
Accessible5.9Not published by the journalNot publicly verifiedSee details
Remote Sensing
Remote Sens.
Accessible4.3Not published by the journal22 days median to first decision (MDPI, first half of 2026)See details
SustainabilityAccessible4.1Not published by the journal16.9 days median to first decision (first half of 2026)See details

Found your target journal - now check if your manuscript is ready

Most desk rejections come down to scope and framing, not the science itself. Start with the Free Readiness Scan to check your manuscript against what environment & sustainability editors actually look for before you commit to a submission.

Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Run my Free Readiness Scan →

Understanding Journal Tiers

Top Tier

Tier 1 journals here want a strong environmental problem, disciplined methods, and evidence that changes how the field thinks or acts. Broad sustainability language alone will not get a paper through.

Strong Option

Tier 2 journals are often review-forward or implementation-forward. They reward synthesis quality, comparative framing, and clear utility more than novelty alone.

Accessible

Tier 3 journals can be the right choice for solid, narrower studies, but they still punish vague framing and weak benchmarking.

Publishing in Environment & Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability publishing spans very different manuscript types: environmental chemistry, engineered systems, climate and ecosystem science, and broad sustainability implementation. The most common editorial mistake is acting as if these all belong in the same venue. Environmental Science & Technology, Water Research, and Journal of Hazardous Materials are strong science-and-engineering targets where methodological rigor and applied significance both matter. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews and Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences serve synthesis and review roles, not ordinary primary-research positioning. Global Change Biology is a strong fit when the paper is really about ecosystem and climate-system consequences rather than only a technical intervention. Sustainability and RSC Advances are broader and more accessible, but editors still expect a clear contribution and honest framing.

Guidance by Career Stage

🎓 Graduate Students

Start by being precise about the problem class: contaminant science, water systems, sustainability implementation, or ecosystem change. That alone prevents many bad submissions.

🔬 Postdocs

Use journal choice to show whether your work is chemistry-led, systems-led, or policy-and-implementation led. Editors pick up on this immediately.

👨‍🔬 Principal Investigators

Build a target ladder inside the right environmental subfield rather than chasing whichever title has the biggest brand name.

⏱️ Review Timelines

Editorial screening is usually fast when the paper is obviously off-scope. The biggest self-inflicted delay is using a sustainability frame for a paper that is really a narrower environmental-engineering study, or vice versa.

🔓 Open Access & Costs

APCs and hybrid options vary, but the more important planning question is whether the journal's audience matches the people who need to read and cite the work.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • ✕Using generic climate or sustainability framing without a real environmental-science contribution
  • ✕Submitting review-style synthesis to primary-research journals or vice versa
  • ✕Not making the practical or policy significance explicit enough for editors
  • ✕Treating broad journals as if they have no scope filter

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I choose between ES&T, Water Research, and Journal of Hazardous Materials?

Choose based on the scientific core of the paper: contaminant and environmental chemistry, water systems and treatment, or hazard-focused environmental materials and processes.

When is Sustainability the right journal?

When the work is solid, implementation-relevant, and written for a broader sustainability audience rather than a narrow environmental-science specialty.

What makes a paper fit Global Change Biology?

The paper needs to say something meaningful about biological or ecosystem response at a climate or global-change scale, not just report a local environmental intervention.

Latest Journal-Specific Guides in This Field

Journal • Submission guide
Biological Conservation (Elsevier) Submission Guide: Portal, 6-Day First Decision & Routing
What submitting to Biological Conservation actually requires: the Elsevier Editorial Manager portal via the ScienceDirect submit page, the 6-day submission-to-first-decision figure on ScienceDirect, the landscape-scale European editorial lens, and the routing distinction from Conservation Biology (SCB/Wiley).
Bioresour. Technol. • Impact factor
Bioresource Technology Impact Factor 2026: Ranking, Quartile & What It Means
Bioresource Technology impact factor is 8.2. Five-year JIF 9.0, Q1, rank 1/20. See comparisons and what it means for authors.
Bioresour. Technol. • Submission guide
Bioresource Technology Submission Guide: Requirements & Process
Bioresource Technology submission guide: bioresource and bioenergy research with quantified yield, conversion-efficiency, or sustainability metrics.
Journal • Submission guide
Chemosphere Submission Guide
A practical Chemosphere submission guide for environmental-chemistry researchers evaluating their work against the journal's mechanism and analysis bar.
Journal • Submission guide
Desalination Submission Guide
A practical Desalination journal submission guide for water-treatment researchers evaluating their work against the journal's process and performance bar.
Journal • Submission guide
Ecological Indicators Submission Guide
A practical Ecological Indicators submission guide for ecology researchers evaluating their work against the journal's indicator-development bar.

More Guides in This Field

Environ. Sci. Technology • Review timeline
Environmental Science & Technology Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
Environmental Science & Technology is often fast at triage and much slower once the paper enters a real environmental-review process.
Sci. Total Environment • Publishing guide
Major Revision at Science of the Total Environment: What It Means, Next Steps
If Science of the Total Environment sent your manuscript back as a major revision, here is what the decision means, your roughly two-to-three-month window, how the Elsevier handling editor and original reviewers re-review, and how to write the point-by-point response that survives a second round.
Journal • Submission guide
Process Safety and Environmental Protection Submission Guide
A practical Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) submission guide for process safety researchers evaluating their work against the journal's safety and environmental bar.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. • Submission guide
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews Submission Guide: What Editors Screen Before Review
This Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews submission guide helps authors decide whether the manuscript is really an RSER paper and whether the literature contribution is strong enough.
Sci. Total Environment • Manuscript prep
Science of the Total Environment Response to Reviewers: How to Write a Rebuttal That Wins (2026)
Pre-submission and post-decision rebuttal guide for Science of the Total Environment authors. Grounded in pre-submission reviews on STOTEN-targeted manuscripts.
Sci. Total Environment • Submission guide
Science of The Total Environment Submission Guide: Requirements, Formatting and What Editors Want
Science of The Total Environment processes over 10,000 submissions per year. This guide covers manuscript types, formatting requirements, data sharing policies, and what handling editors check first.
Bioresour. Technol. • Acceptance rate
Bioresource Technology Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can Use
Elsevier's journal catalog lists a 12% acceptance rate for Bioresource Technology. The better submission question is whether the manuscript reads like real conversion or resource-recovery technology rather than narrow lab work.
Building and Environment • Review timeline
Building and Environment Review Time: First Decision and Revision Planning
Building and Environment can make an immediate editorial decision, while papers reaching review need a fuller evidence and revision plan.
Building and Environment • Submission guide
Building and Environment Submission Guide
A practical Building and Environment submission guide for built-environment researchers evaluating their work against the journal's performance and analytical bar.
Building and Environment • Submission process
Building and Environment Submission Process: What Happens After Upload
A practical Building and Environment submission process guide covering Editorial Manager upload, editable source files, PDF approval, technical checks, editor triage, peer review, revision, and decisions.
Journal • Submission guide
Energy and Buildings Submission Guide
A practical Energy and Buildings submission guide for building-energy researchers evaluating their work against the journal's quantitative analysis bar.
Journal • Submission guide
EHP Submission Guide (2026): Submitting to Environmental Health Perspectives After the ACS Move
What submitting to Environmental Health Perspectives actually requires: the NIEHS-to-ACS Publications transition completed at the close of 2025, the article-publishing-charge waiver for new submissions, and the top environmental-health editorial culture.

Ready to submit? Check your manuscript first.

Start with the Free Readiness Scan to review your scope, significance framing, methods, and literature coverage against environment & sustainability journal standards before you submit.

Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Run my Free Readiness Scan →