Field Guide
Top Materials, Energy & Engineering Journals
Journals for materials chemistry, applied energy systems, interfaces, and engineering-led translational work. This guide covers 46 journals with impact factors, acceptance rates, review timelines, and open access costs - everything you need to choose the right venue for your research.
Journal Comparison Table
| Journal | Tier | Impact Factor | Acceptance Rate | Review Time | Open Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical Reviews | Top Tier | 64.2 | ~5% | ~120 days to first decision | See details |
| Chemical Society Reviews Chem. Soc. Rev. | Top Tier | 48.3 | ~15-25% | ~150-200 days median | See details |
| Advanced Materials | Top Tier | 29.1 | ~6% | ~40 days to first decision | See details |
| Advanced Energy Materials Adv. Energy Mater. | Top Tier | 25.5 | ~15-25% | ~100-140 days median | See details |
| Advanced Functional Materials Adv. Funct. Materials | Top Tier | 19.9 | ~12-18% | ~21 days median to first decision | See details |
| Angewandte Chemie - International Edition Angewandte Chemie | Top Tier | 17.6 | ~8% | ~30 days to first decision | See details |
| Angewandte Chemie International Edition Angewandte Chemie | Top Tier | 17.6 | ~15-25% | 9 days to first decision | See details |
| ACS Nano | Top Tier | 17.3 | ~8.4% | 31.9 days median to first decision with peer review | See details |
| Journal of the American Chemical Society JACS | Top Tier | 16.6 | ~8% | ~45 days to first decision | See details |
| ACS Catalysis ACS Catal. | Top Tier | 13.6 | ~20-30% | ~100-130 days median | See details |
| Acta Materialia | Top Tier | 10.7 | ~20-30% | ~3-5 months to first decision | See details |
| Nano Letters Nano Lett. | Top Tier | 9.1 | ~15-20% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| EnergyChem | Strong Option | 23.8 (publisher-displayed) | Not publicly disclosed | Not publicly verified | See details |
| Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy Appl. Catal. B | Strong Option | 19.7 | ~30-35% | 5 days to first decision | See details |
| Carbohydrate Polymers Carbohydr. Polym. | Strong Option | 13.2 | ~45-55% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Chemical Engineering Journal | Strong Option | 12.5 | ~20-30% | 10 days to first decision | See details |
| Journal of Controlled Release JCR | Strong Option | 12.4 | Highly selective Elsevier drug-delivery journal | Editorial screening first; peer review after delivery-mechanism fit | See details |
| Applied Energy Appl. Energy | Strong Option | 12.2 | ~35-45% | 1 day to first decision | See details |
| Small | Strong Option | 11.8 | ~15-25% | ~100-140 days median | See details |
| Journal of Energy Storage | Strong Option | 10.7 | Selective Elsevier energy-storage journal | Elsevier insights report first decision and review timelines at journal level | See details |
| Energy | Strong Option | 10.1 | ~40-50% | ~100-140 days median | See details |
| Journal of Colloid and Interface Science J. Colloid Interface Sci. | Strong Option | 9.6 | ~40-50% | ~100-130 days median | See details |
| Journal of Materials Chemistry A | Strong Option | 9.2 | ~35-40% | ~100-140 days median | See details |
| Journal of CO2 Utilization | Strong Option | 8.6 | Selective Elsevier CO2 utilization journal | Editorial screening first; peer review after editor fit | See details |
| Journal of Power Sources J. Power Sources | Strong Option | 8.4 | ~30-40% | ~100-130 days median | See details |
| ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces ACS Appl. Materials | Strong Option | 7.8 | ~25-30% | ~30 days median to first decision | See details |
| Fuel | Strong Option | 7.8 | ~40-50% | ~100-130 days median | See details |
| Analytical Chemistry Anal. Chem. | Strong Option | 7.3 | ~35-45% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry J. Agric. Food Chem. | Strong Option | 6.7 | ~40-50% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Applied Surface Science | Strong Option | 6.6 | 19% | 9 days to first decision | See details |
| Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects Colloids and Surfaces A | Strong Option | 5.4 | Not publicly stated | 7 days to first decision | See details |
| Microchemical Journal Microchem. J. | Strong Option | 5.1 | Not publicly disclosed | 3 days to first decision; 29 days after review | See details |
| Applied Catalysis A: General Appl. Catal. A | Strong Option | 4.8 | Not publicly reported | Check current publisher guidance | See details |
| Chemical Communications Chem. Commun. | Strong Option | 4.3 | ~20-30% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Journal of Physical Chemistry C J. Phys. Chem. C | Strong Option | 3.4 | ~45-55% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Journal of Cleaner Production J. Cleaner Production | Accessible | 10.7 | ~20-25% | ~45 days median to first decision | See details |
| Food Chemistry Food Chem. | Accessible | 10.4 | ~35-40% | ~80-120 days median | See details |
| International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Int. J. Hydrog. Energy | Accessible | 9.2 | ~40-50% | ~90-130 days median | See details |
| Construction and Building Materials Constr. Build. Materials | Accessible | 8.9 | ~30-35% | ~100-150 days median | See details |
| International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Int. J. Biol. Macromol. | Accessible | 8.7 | ~45-55% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| Journal of Alloys and Compounds J. Alloys Compd. | Accessible | 6.7 | ~40-50% | ~100-130 days median | See details |
| Ceramics International Ceram. Int. | Accessible | 6 | ~45-55% | ~90-120 days median | See details |
| International Journal of Molecular Sciences IJMS | Accessible | 5.6 | ~30% | ~45 days to first decision | See details |
| Molecules | Accessible | 5.1 | ~50-60% | ~60-90 days median | See details |
| Materials | Accessible | 3.7 | ~50-60% | ~70-100 days median | See details |
| Carbohydrate Research Carbohydr. Res. | Accessible | 2.5 | Not publicly disclosed | 4 days to first decision | See details |
Found your target journal - now check if your manuscript is ready
Most desk rejections come down to scope and framing, not the science itself. Start with the Free Readiness Scan to check your manuscript against what materials, energy & engineering editors actually look for before you commit to a submission.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Your manuscript is never used to train any model.
Run my Free Readiness Scan →Understanding Journal Tiers
Tier 1 journals here want field-level significance, clean benchmarking, and a strong mechanistic or design insight. A large performance gain without a convincing explanation is rarely enough.
Tier 2 journals are strong targets for papers with solid novelty, good controls, and a clear applied use case, even if the work is not broad enough for the flagship brands.
Tier 3 journals are still useful venues when the contribution is narrower, more incremental, or strongly application-specific. Fit, benchmarking, and reproducibility still matter.
Publishing in Materials, Energy & Engineering
This field cluster covers journals that sit at the intersection of functional materials, device-relevant chemistry, and applied energy engineering. The central decision is usually not whether the work is "good", but whether it reads as a mechanistic materials story, a performance-led engineering paper, or an application-focused deployment paper. Advanced Materials, Advanced Functional Materials, and ACS Nano are the prestige anchors. They reward clearer conceptual contribution, sharper benchmarking, and stronger generality than the broader engineering journals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Journal of Materials Chemistry A are often the practical high-quality targets when the work is strong but not top-tier enough for the flagship titles. Energy-oriented journals like Energy and International Journal of Hydrogen Energy are better when the paper is systems-facing, application-driven, or policy-and-technology adjacent. Journal of Alloys and Compounds and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules are more accessible and can be the right venue when the science is solid but the novelty bar is more local than field-shaping.
Guidance by Career Stage
🎓 Graduate Students
Target the journal that matches the actual story, not the most prestigious logo. A clean, well-positioned paper in a realistic journal is worth more than an avoidable desk rejection.
🔬 Postdocs
Use these journals to signal what kind of scientist you are becoming: mechanism-forward, interface/materials-forward, or deployment/application-forward. Editors notice when that identity is coherent.
👨🔬 Principal Investigators
The best choice usually depends on whether you want visibility in materials chemistry, energy systems, or application engineering. Build a ladder of venues instead of treating every paper as a flagship gamble.
⏱️ Review Timelines
Desk screening is usually fast when fit is obviously wrong. The slowdowns happen when a paper is technically sound but the novelty bar is borderline, so make the contribution class obvious from page one.
🔓 Open Access & Costs
Open-access costs and hybrid options vary widely across this cluster. For planning, compare APCs alongside audience, review speed, and how much journal prestige actually matters for the manuscript.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- ✕Submitting performance tables without proving why the advance matters mechanistically
- ✕Benchmarking against weak baselines instead of the papers editors will compare you to
- ✕Framing an engineering optimization as if it were a field-level conceptual advance
- ✕Ignoring whether the journal mainly rewards chemistry, materials design, or systems application
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Advanced Functional Materials and Energy-style journals?
Advanced Functional Materials usually wants a clearer materials or device-level conceptual story, while Energy-style journals more often reward application relevance, systems context, and practical significance.
When is ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces a better target than ACS Nano?
When the work is strong and useful but does not have the breadth, novelty, or conceptual lift that ACS Nano expects. AMI is often the right high-quality applied target.
Do broader engineering journals have lower standards?
No. The standards are different, not absent. Reproducibility, benchmarking, and fit still determine whether the paper survives editorial screening.
Detailed Journal Guides
Latest Journal-Specific Guides in This Field
More Guides in This Field
Related Resources
Ready to submit? Check your manuscript first.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan to review your scope, significance framing, methods, and literature coverage against materials, energy & engineering journal standards before you submit.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Your manuscript is never used to train any model.
Run my Free Readiness Scan →