Full Review
The pre-submission read, on your own manuscript.
Upload a manuscript and get back what a reviewer would object to first: scope fit, the framing problems, the statistics a referee will stop on, and the references that will not survive a check. The free read tells you where the paper stands; the full review is the line-by-line version you act on.
Start here
The free material that teaches the same skill. Read all of it without buying anything.
The Submission-Ready System
The full method, worked on your own paper one task at a time: from naming your contribution to reading the decision letter and writing the response.
Course10 modules30 lessonsFree
The desk rejection report
The editorial patterns that end a submission in four days without a reviewer ever reading it, and what top-tier journals screen for first.
DataOriginal analysisFree
Which reporting guideline fits your study
CONSORT for trials, PRISMA for reviews, STROBE for observational work, ARRIVE for animal research, and ten more, with how to tell which one you owe.
GuideFree
Also worth reading
Methodology check
Whether your methods section contains what a reviewer needs to believe the result, and what a replication would need to repeat it.
ToolInstant
Word, figure and reference limits for 57 journals
Word counts, figure and table limits, reference caps and abstract requirements, gathered from current author guidelines in one table.
Data57 journalsFree
The NIH F31 predoctoral fellowship
Eligibility, award amounts, every application component, how reviewers score it, and the mistakes that sink an otherwise strong application.
GuideFree
The NIH F32 postdoctoral fellowship
Eligibility, current stipend rates, the application components, and the strategy questions a postdoc has to answer before writing anything.
GuideFree
The NIH K99/R00 award
The eligibility window that catches people out, how the K99 and R00 phases differ, the review criteria, and what makes an application fail.
GuideFree
The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
Eligibility, the Personal and Research Statements, how Broader Impacts is actually judged, and how the review process works.
GuideFree
Writing the cover letter, with examples
What editors actually read, what belongs in it, the mistakes that trigger a desk rejection on their own, and worked examples for different situations.
GuideFree
The 42-point submission checklist
Journal fit, reporting standards, authorship, ethics, evidence and accessibility, worked as a checklist you fill in rather than an article you read.
GuideFreeNo login
Open access, APCs and mandates
What an APC will cost you, what the NIH and UKRI mandates require, and the open-access route for 57 top biomedical journals.
Guide57 journalsFree
Literature search strategy worksheet
Turning a research question into a documented, reproducible search, which is also what a systematic review will later require of you.
GuideFreeNo login
What rights you keep after publication
Copyright transfer against licensing, what you may still do with your own work, green open access, and where repositories fit.
GuideFree
Writing a scientific CV
Section order, formatting publications, authorship notation, and what a hiring committee is scanning for in the first thirty seconds.
GuideFree
Writing an academic research statement
Past work, current work and future direction, written so a faculty hiring committee can see a programme rather than a list.
GuideFree
AI tools for researchers, by workflow stage
Forty-plus tools sorted by what you are actually doing: literature search, writing, journal selection, pre-submission review, figures.
GuideFree
The biomedical publishing reference library
The curated index of everything above: desk rejection, submission readiness, journal benchmarks and the rest, in one place.
CollectionFree
The academic publishing process
Preprints, publication ethics, why papers get rejected, the risks that appear at acceptance stage, and how the process fits together.
CollectionGuide collection
Preparing the manuscript
Cover letters, figures, responding to reviewers, and the preparation decisions that are made long before submission.
CollectionGuide collection
Desk rejection
What the editor screen actually catches, journal by journal, and the manuscript patterns that end a submission before review.
CollectionGuide collection
Open access and APCs
What publishing open access costs, how to read a fee structure, and how to assess journal quality when the incentives run the other way.
CollectionGuide collection
Research funding
Grant databases, funding pressure, and how publication strategy and funding strategy pull on each other.
CollectionGuide collection
Read your paper the way an editor will
Upload a manuscript and get the desk-screen read for free: scope fit, the framing problems, and what a reviewer would object to first.
ToolFree previewYour own paper