What is the impact factor of Applied Energy?

Applied Energy has an impact factor of 11.0 (2024). This places it among the top-tier journals in its field with Applied Energy published by Elsevier is the premier journal for applied energy research and systems optimization.

How long does Appl. Energy take to review?

Applied Energy typically takes ~100-140 days median. The full review process involves 5 main stages: manuscript preparation, submission via elsevier system, and peer review.

All Journal Guides

Journal Guide

Applied Energy Impact Factor 11.0: Publishing Guide

Q: What is the acceptance rate of Applied Energy?

Applied Energy has an acceptance rate of ~35-45%. A common reason for rejection is energy component optimization without system-level context. Optimizing individual components in isolation without considering system integration has limited real-world impact. Show how component improvement affects overall system efficiency and cost.

Q: Is Applied Energy peer reviewed?

Yes, Applied Energy is fully peer reviewed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review by 2-3 energy experts assess technology novelty, system integration, economic analysis, and practical significance. Reviewers often include industry experts. First decision 100-140 days..

Q: What does Appl. Energy look for in submissions?

Practical energy system improvement with quantified benefit: Present energy technology or approach improving real system performance. Enhanced efficiency? Lower cost? Better grid integration? Quantify improvement: percentage efficiency gain, cost reduction, carbon savings, or operational benefits with numbers.

Energy systems optimization: efficiency, storage, management, and integration

11.0

Impact Factor (2024)

~35-45%

Acceptance Rate

~100-140 days median

Time to First Decision

What Appl. Energy Publishes

Applied Energy published by Elsevier is the premier journal for applied energy research and systems optimization. With JIF 11.0 and Q1 ranking in Energy & Fuels, AE emphasizes practical energy systems, efficiency improvements, and technology integration. The journal publishes research on energy conversion, storage, management, and optimization across applications. Critically: Applied Energy values research with practical energy system application. Pure theoretical analysis without system relevance is less competitive. The journal seeks papers advancing real energy systems performance through efficiency, renewable integration, or novel technologies.

Energy efficiency: building systems, industrial processes, transportation
Renewable energy systems: wind, solar, hybrid integration, grid interaction
Energy storage: batteries, thermal storage, mechanical storage systems
Energy management: demand management, grid optimization, smart systems
Thermal systems: heating, cooling, waste heat recovery
Power generation: turbines, generators, combined cycles
Energy conversion: fuel cells, heat engines, power electronics
System optimization: modeling, control, techno-economic analysis

Editor Insight

“Applied Energy publishes research advancing practical energy system performance. We seek papers combining technological innovation with system-level analysis, techno-economic feasibility, and environmental perspective. The best papers address real energy challenges with proven solutions.”

What Appl. Energy Editors Look For

Practical energy system improvement with quantified benefit

Present energy technology or approach improving real system performance. Enhanced efficiency? Lower cost? Better grid integration? Quantify improvement: percentage efficiency gain, cost reduction, carbon savings, or operational benefits with numbers.

System-level analysis with realistic operational constraints

Analyze energy in system context: grid interaction, load matching, seasonal variation, infrastructure requirements. Addressing real-world constraints strengthens papers. Isolated component optimization without system perspective is weak.

Comprehensive techno-economic analysis including costs and feasibility

Address capital costs, operational expenses, maintenance, payback period. Compare levelized cost with alternatives. Discuss deployment feasibility: grid readiness, supply chain, regulatory requirements. Technical innovation without economic viability has limited impact.

Experimental validation or operational data from real systems

Test approaches on actual systems or with field data. Simulations are common but experimental validation of real system performance significantly strengthens papers.

Environmental impact assessment and sustainability perspective

Address full environmental footprint: carbon emissions, water use, material requirements. Lifecycle perspective more meaningful than just operational efficiency.

Why Papers Get Rejected

These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Appl. Energy's editorial review:

Energy component optimization without system-level context

Optimizing individual components in isolation without considering system integration has limited real-world impact. Show how component improvement affects overall system efficiency and cost.

Claiming efficiency improvements without rigorous measurement

Quantify efficiency gains with clear methodology and error analysis. Unsupported efficiency claims are quickly challenged.

Ignoring integration challenges and practical deployment barriers

New technologies must address practical integration issues: grid compatibility, equipment readiness, infrastructure requirements. Theoretical advantages without implementation feasibility have limited adoption potential.

Cost-benefit analysis missing or incomplete

Energy decisions driven by economics. Quantify costs: capital, operational, maintenance. Show payback period or cost-effectiveness. Missing cost analysis is major weakness.

Environmental claims without comprehensive lifecycle assessment

Operating efficiency alone doesn't guarantee sustainability. Manufacturing, material extraction, end-of-life treatment affect overall impact. Lifecycle perspective required.

Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?

The quick diagnostic reads your full manuscript against Appl. Energy's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.

Run Free Readiness Scan →

Insider Tips from Appl. Energy Authors

Building energy efficiency and retrofit studies have strong practical impact

Research on building energy optimization, HVAC efficiency, or retrofit strategies addressing significant energy use has high practical relevance and often rapid adoption potential.

Renewable integration and grid flexibility increasingly competitive

Work addressing renewable energy variability, grid stability, demand-side management, or energy storage enabling renewable integration aligns with energy transition priorities.

Industrial energy efficiency and waste heat recovery valued

Industrial energy represents significant consumption. Papers showing efficiency improvements or waste heat valorization have practical economic impact.

Real operational data from pilot or deployed systems valued

Case studies with actual system operational data, pilot projects, or full-scale deployments demonstrate real-world performance more convincingly than simulations.

Techno-economic and environmental assessment critical

Papers combining technical innovation with rigorous cost-benefit and lifecycle assessment analysis are more competitive than purely technical papers.

The Appl. Energy Submission Process

Manuscript preparation

Prep

7,000-10,000 words with 6-8 figures. Include technology/system description, efficiency analysis, techno-economic evaluation, lifecycle assessment, system integration discussion, and comparison with existing approaches. Supporting: cost analysis, environmental impact data, operational details.

Submission via Elsevier system

Day 0

Submit at https://www.editorialmanager.com/APENERGY/. Required: manuscript emphasizing practical system impact and energy significance, figures showing efficiency and cost comparison, cover letter highlighting performance advantages.

Editorial assessment

1-2 weeks

Editor assesses practical energy significance, system-level thinking, and feasibility. Papers lacking system context or cost analysis face lower priority. Moderate desk rejection ~25-35%.

Peer review

100-140 days

2-3 energy experts assess technology novelty, system integration, economic analysis, and practical significance. Reviewers often include industry experts. First decision 100-140 days.

Revision and publication

Revision: 4-8 weeks

Revisions often request additional cost analysis, system integration discussion, or environmental assessment. Publication 2-4 weeks after acceptance.

Appl. Energy by the Numbers

2024 Impact Factor	10.2
5-Year Impact Factor	10.8
Acceptance rate	~35-45%
Desk rejection rate	~25-35%
Median first decision	~120 days
Open access option	$3,200 USD
Publisher	Elsevier
Founded	1976

Before you submit

Appl. Energy accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.

The pre-submission diagnostic runs a live literature search, scores your manuscript section by section, and gives you a prioritized fix list calibrated to Appl. Energy. ~30 minutes.

Run Free Readiness Scan See a sample report

Article Types

Article

7,000-10,000 words

Energy system research with techno-economic analysis

Review

10,000-15,000 words

Energy technology or system review

Short Communication

4,000-6,000 words

Focused energy system finding

Landmark Appl. Energy Papers

Papers that defined fields and changed science:

Building energy modeling and optimization (2000s+) - enabled efficiency improvements
Renewable energy integration studies (2000s+) - addressed grid stability challenges
Industrial energy audits and efficiency (various) - quantified conservation potential
Energy storage system development (2010s+) - enabled renewable penetration
Smart grid and demand management (2010s+) - optimized energy consumption

Preparing a Appl. Energy Submission?

Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Appl. Energy and know exactly what editors look for.

Run Free Readiness Scan

Need expert depth? Human review from $1,000

NDA-protected

Confidential

Primary Fields

Energy EfficiencyRenewable Energy IntegrationEnergy StorageBuilding Energy SystemsIndustrial EnergyGrid Optimization

Related Journal Guides

All journal guides

All articles

Ready to submit to Appl. Energy?

A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Appl. Energy editors look for.

Need field-expert depth? Human review from $1,000