Journal Comparison4 min readUpdated Apr 1, 2026

Advanced Materials vs ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces: Journal Comparison 2026

Advanced Materials is 3× more selective and cites applied work. ACS Applied Materials is faster, broader, and accessible. Choose AM for materials breakthroughs, ACSA&I for applications that prove value.

By Senior Researcher, Chemistry

Senior Researcher, Chemistry

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for chemistry journals, with deep experience evaluating submissions to JACS, Angewandte Chemie, Chemical Reviews, and ACS-family journals.

Journal fit

See whether this paper looks realistic for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Run the Free Readiness Scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as your target journal and see whether this paper looks like a realistic submission.

Find my best fitAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.See sample report
Journal context

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces at a glance

Key metrics to place the journal before deciding whether it fits your manuscript and career goals.

Full journal profile
Impact factor8.2Clarivate JCR
Acceptance rate~25-30%Overall selectivity
Time to decision~30 dayFirst decision
Open access APC$3,500 USDGold OA option

What makes this journal worth targeting

  • IF 8.2 puts ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces in a visible tier — citations from papers here carry real weight.
  • Scope specificity matters more than impact factor for most manuscript decisions.
  • Acceptance rate of ~~25-30% means fit determines most outcomes.

When to look elsewhere

  • When your paper sits at the edge of the journal's stated scope — borderline fit rarely improves after submission.
  • If timeline matters: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces takes ~~30 day. A faster-turnaround journal may suit a grant or job deadline better.
  • If OA is required: gold OA costs $3,500 USD. Check institutional agreements before submitting.
Quick comparison

Advanced Materials vs ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces at a glance

Use the table to see where the journals diverge before you read the longer comparison. The right choice usually comes down to scope, editorial filter, and the kind of paper you actually have.

Question
Advanced Materials
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Best fit
Advanced Materials is a high-impact materials science journal publishing research on.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is one of the most widely read journals in materials.
Editors prioritize
Genuinely novel materials or synthesis routes
Strong application connection - not just interesting materials
Typical article types
Full Article, Communication
Article, Letter
Closest alternatives
Nature Materials, Matter
Advanced Materials (Wiley), Advanced Functional Materials (Wiley)

Quick answer: Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research. Choose ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces if the application and performance matter more than the material's newness.

Side-by-side comparison

Metric
Advanced Materials
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Impact Factor 2024
26.8
8.2
Acceptance Rate
~6%
~25-30%
Time to First Decision
45-60 days
35-45 days
Desk Rejection Rate
30-40%
10-15%
Desk Decision Time
10-14 days
5-10 days
APC
€5,200
~$5,000
Publisher
Wiley
ACS (American Chemical Society)
Scope
Materials discovery, synthesis, characterization
Applied materials, devices, functional systems
Typical Review Pool
Highly selective peer reviewers
Broad materials chemistry reviewer base
Citation Density
Higher (more frequently cited)
Moderate
Readership
Academic materials science labs globally
Academic + industrial materials research

The biggest difference

Advanced Materials is a flagship high-impact journal. It publishes materials breakthroughs that redefine fields. Acceptance is an honor; desk rejection is common and not a reflection on work quality, just editorial prioritization.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a high-quality specialty journal. It publishes solid, well-executed applied materials research. Acceptance is achievable for good work that demonstrates clear value.

One is elite. The other is excellent. Know which you're aiming for.

Desk rejection triggers

Advanced Materials desk-rejects when:

  • The material itself is not novel (known composition, standard synthesis)
  • The characterization doesn't reveal new material science insights
  • The application is incremental use of a known material
  • The scope feels too narrow or too applied for a materials flagship
  • The work doesn't align with the journal's positioning as a field-leading publication

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces desk-rejects when:

  • Results don't exceed published benchmarks in the application space
  • Characterization is insufficient to understand why the material works
  • Claims are unsupported by sufficient experimental evidence
  • The paper is out of scope (pure chemistry without materials application angle)
  • Data presentation is unclear or incomplete

Who should choose Advanced Materials

Target Advanced Materials if:

  • You've discovered a genuinely new material property or synthesis route
  • Your characterization reveals something unexpected about material behavior
  • Other labs will build on your work because the material itself is valuable
  • You're willing to accept a 94% rejection rate because the work is truly novel
  • You can articulate why materials scientists across subfields should care

This is the journal for materials breakthroughs. If you're hoping it might work but aren't confident in the novelty, it won't.

Journal fit

Ready to find out which journal fits? Run the scan for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces first.

Run the scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as the target. Get a fit signal that makes the comparison concrete.

Find my best fitAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.See sample report

Who should choose ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Target ACS Applied & Interfaces if:

  • You have solid applied research with clear functional advantage
  • You've characterized the material well enough to understand why it works
  • The application is real and the performance metrics are competitive
  • You want a faster path to publication with higher success probability
  • Your work advances the state-of-the-art in a specific application space, even if the material is known

This journal is the realistic choice for 80% of applied materials work. It's not second-tier; it's appropriate-tier.

Strategic decision framework

Ask yourself: "If this paper gets rejected, is it because the work isn't good, or because the materials novelty isn't sufficient for a flagship journal?"

If you think "the novelty is right for Advanced Materials," submit there.

If you think "the novelty might not be enough, but the functional results are excellent," go to ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

If you're genuinely unsure, that's actually a signal. Uncertainty often means your work is stronger in applied materials than in fundamental materials science. Submit to ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. You'll get published faster and with higher probability.

The acceptance rate paradox

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces has 25-30% acceptance because it publishes applied work the journal truly wants. Advanced Materials has 6% because it's flagship and rejects novelty even in technically perfect papers.

The 25% journal is not "easier." It's not "lower-tier." It's "appropriate for applied materials research." Don't interpret a 6% acceptance rate as a signal that Advanced Materials is better. It's a signal that it's different.

After desk review

If Advanced Materials desk-rejects you (most likely outcome), ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is your next submission. Don't take the rejection personally. Reframe: your work is excellent applied materials research appropriate for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. The timeline still works in your favor (faster publication), and the journal is well-respected in industry and academia.

The Real Difference: Prestige vs Practicality

Factor
Advanced Materials
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
IF (JCR 2024)
26.8
8.2
Acceptance rate
~12%
~30%
Paper format
Communications + full articles
Full articles
Review time
2-4 months
2-3 months
Best for
Novel materials concepts with broad impact
Applied materials with device/system performance data
Desk rejection rate
~70%
~30%
APC (if OA)
~$5,500
~$2,500

Choose Advanced Materials if: Your paper introduces a genuinely new material concept or demonstrates a property that changes what's possible. Advanced Materials wants "first" and "best", first demonstration of a new material class, best performance in a category.

Choose ACS AMI if: Your paper applies known materials to real devices or systems with solid performance data. ACS AMI values thorough characterization and practical impact over conceptual novelty.

The honest calibration: If you're debating between the two, your paper is probably ACS AMI level. Advanced Materials papers are usually not debatable, they're either clearly paradigm-level or they're not. Submitting to Advanced Materials when the work is ACS AMI level costs you 2-4 months in desk rejection time.

A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can give you an honest assessment of whether your materials paper is competitive at Advanced Materials or whether ACS AMI is the strategic choice.

Publication costs compared

Cost
Advanced Materials
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Subscription publication
$0
$0 (no page/color charges)
Gold OA option
~$5,510 (Wiley)
~$5,000 (ACS AuthorChoice)
Institutional agreements
Wiley Open Access Account
ACS Read & Publish

Both journals allow $0 subscription publication. ACS AMI is notable for charging no page or color charges at all, even for subscription papers with color figures. If your institution has agreements with both publishers, cost is not a differentiator. If you're paying out of pocket for OA, both are in the $5,000-$5,500 range.

Bottom line

Advanced Materials if your contribution is a material breakthrough. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces if your contribution is a functional application with strong performance. Both pathways lead to respected publications. Choose based on the strength and type of your novelty, not on which journal has a higher IF.

The most common mistake: submitting to Advanced Materials when the work is genuinely excellent applied materials research. This costs 2-4 months in desk rejection and delays publication at ACS AMI where the work belongs. A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can give you an honest read on journal fit before you commit.

The materials journal landscape: where these two sit

Journal
IF (JCR 2024)
Publisher
Best for
Nature Materials
38.5
Springer Nature
Fundamental materials breakthroughs
Advanced Materials
26.8
Wiley
Novel materials with fundamental insight
Advanced Functional Materials
19.0
Wiley
Functional materials with performance focus
ACS Nano
16.0
ACS
Nanoscale materials and devices
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
8.2
ACS
Applied materials with functional demonstration
Chemistry of Materials
7.3
ACS
Synthesis and structure of new materials
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
9.5
RSC
Renewable energy and sustainability materials

If Advanced Materials desk-rejects, the natural step down within Wiley is Advanced Functional Materials (IF 19.0). If ACS AMI desk-rejects, the step down within ACS is Chemistry of Materials (IF 7.3) or ACS Applied Energy Materials (IF 5.4).

A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can identify which tier in this landscape your paper fits before you commit to a submission. The scan takes 60 seconds.

Frequently asked questions

Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research.

Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research.

Choose based on scope fit, audience, and your paper's specific strengths. The decision aids above outline when each journal is the better choice.

References

Sources

  1. Advanced Materials - Author Guidelines
  2. Advanced Materials - Journal Homepage
  3. Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (JCR 2024)
  4. Acs Applied Materials Interfaces - Author Guidelines

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: whether the package is ready, what drives desk rejection, how journals compare, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Final step

See whether this paper fits ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Run the Free Readiness Scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as your target journal and get a manuscript-specific fit signal before you commit.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Find my best fit