Advanced Materials vs ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces: Journal Comparison 2026
Advanced Materials is 3× more selective and cites applied work. ACS Applied Materials is faster, broader, and accessible. Choose AM for materials breakthroughs, ACSA&I for applications that prove value.
Senior Researcher, Chemistry
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for chemistry journals, with deep experience evaluating submissions to JACS, Angewandte Chemie, Chemical Reviews, and ACS-family journals.
Journal fit
See whether this paper looks realistic for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Run the Free Readiness Scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as your target journal and see whether this paper looks like a realistic submission.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces at a glance
Key metrics to place the journal before deciding whether it fits your manuscript and career goals.
What makes this journal worth targeting
- IF 8.2 puts ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces in a visible tier — citations from papers here carry real weight.
- Scope specificity matters more than impact factor for most manuscript decisions.
- Acceptance rate of ~~25-30% means fit determines most outcomes.
When to look elsewhere
- When your paper sits at the edge of the journal's stated scope — borderline fit rarely improves after submission.
- If timeline matters: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces takes ~~30 day. A faster-turnaround journal may suit a grant or job deadline better.
- If OA is required: gold OA costs $3,500 USD. Check institutional agreements before submitting.
Advanced Materials vs ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces at a glance
Use the table to see where the journals diverge before you read the longer comparison. The right choice usually comes down to scope, editorial filter, and the kind of paper you actually have.
Question | Advanced Materials | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |
|---|---|---|
Best fit | Advanced Materials is a high-impact materials science journal publishing research on. | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is one of the most widely read journals in materials. |
Editors prioritize | Genuinely novel materials or synthesis routes | Strong application connection - not just interesting materials |
Typical article types | Full Article, Communication | Article, Letter |
Closest alternatives | Nature Materials, Matter | Advanced Materials (Wiley), Advanced Functional Materials (Wiley) |
Quick answer: Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research. Choose ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces if the application and performance matter more than the material's newness.
Side-by-side comparison
Metric | Advanced Materials | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |
|---|---|---|
Impact Factor 2024 | 26.8 | 8.2 |
Acceptance Rate | ~6% | ~25-30% |
Time to First Decision | 45-60 days | 35-45 days |
Desk Rejection Rate | 30-40% | 10-15% |
Desk Decision Time | 10-14 days | 5-10 days |
APC | €5,200 | ~$5,000 |
Publisher | Wiley | ACS (American Chemical Society) |
Scope | Materials discovery, synthesis, characterization | Applied materials, devices, functional systems |
Typical Review Pool | Highly selective peer reviewers | Broad materials chemistry reviewer base |
Citation Density | Higher (more frequently cited) | Moderate |
Readership | Academic materials science labs globally | Academic + industrial materials research |
The biggest difference
Advanced Materials is a flagship high-impact journal. It publishes materials breakthroughs that redefine fields. Acceptance is an honor; desk rejection is common and not a reflection on work quality, just editorial prioritization.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a high-quality specialty journal. It publishes solid, well-executed applied materials research. Acceptance is achievable for good work that demonstrates clear value.
One is elite. The other is excellent. Know which you're aiming for.
Desk rejection triggers
Advanced Materials desk-rejects when:
- The material itself is not novel (known composition, standard synthesis)
- The characterization doesn't reveal new material science insights
- The application is incremental use of a known material
- The scope feels too narrow or too applied for a materials flagship
- The work doesn't align with the journal's positioning as a field-leading publication
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces desk-rejects when:
- Results don't exceed published benchmarks in the application space
- Characterization is insufficient to understand why the material works
- Claims are unsupported by sufficient experimental evidence
- The paper is out of scope (pure chemistry without materials application angle)
- Data presentation is unclear or incomplete
Who should choose Advanced Materials
Target Advanced Materials if:
- You've discovered a genuinely new material property or synthesis route
- Your characterization reveals something unexpected about material behavior
- Other labs will build on your work because the material itself is valuable
- You're willing to accept a 94% rejection rate because the work is truly novel
- You can articulate why materials scientists across subfields should care
This is the journal for materials breakthroughs. If you're hoping it might work but aren't confident in the novelty, it won't.
Journal fit
Ready to find out which journal fits? Run the scan for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces first.
Run the scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as the target. Get a fit signal that makes the comparison concrete.
Who should choose ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Target ACS Applied & Interfaces if:
- You have solid applied research with clear functional advantage
- You've characterized the material well enough to understand why it works
- The application is real and the performance metrics are competitive
- You want a faster path to publication with higher success probability
- Your work advances the state-of-the-art in a specific application space, even if the material is known
This journal is the realistic choice for 80% of applied materials work. It's not second-tier; it's appropriate-tier.
Strategic decision framework
Ask yourself: "If this paper gets rejected, is it because the work isn't good, or because the materials novelty isn't sufficient for a flagship journal?"
If you think "the novelty is right for Advanced Materials," submit there.
If you think "the novelty might not be enough, but the functional results are excellent," go to ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
If you're genuinely unsure, that's actually a signal. Uncertainty often means your work is stronger in applied materials than in fundamental materials science. Submit to ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. You'll get published faster and with higher probability.
The acceptance rate paradox
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces has 25-30% acceptance because it publishes applied work the journal truly wants. Advanced Materials has 6% because it's flagship and rejects novelty even in technically perfect papers.
The 25% journal is not "easier." It's not "lower-tier." It's "appropriate for applied materials research." Don't interpret a 6% acceptance rate as a signal that Advanced Materials is better. It's a signal that it's different.
After desk review
If Advanced Materials desk-rejects you (most likely outcome), ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is your next submission. Don't take the rejection personally. Reframe: your work is excellent applied materials research appropriate for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. The timeline still works in your favor (faster publication), and the journal is well-respected in industry and academia.
The Real Difference: Prestige vs Practicality
Factor | Advanced Materials | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |
|---|---|---|
IF (JCR 2024) | 26.8 | 8.2 |
Acceptance rate | ~12% | ~30% |
Paper format | Communications + full articles | Full articles |
Review time | 2-4 months | 2-3 months |
Best for | Novel materials concepts with broad impact | Applied materials with device/system performance data |
Desk rejection rate | ~70% | ~30% |
APC (if OA) | ~$5,500 | ~$2,500 |
Choose Advanced Materials if: Your paper introduces a genuinely new material concept or demonstrates a property that changes what's possible. Advanced Materials wants "first" and "best", first demonstration of a new material class, best performance in a category.
Choose ACS AMI if: Your paper applies known materials to real devices or systems with solid performance data. ACS AMI values thorough characterization and practical impact over conceptual novelty.
The honest calibration: If you're debating between the two, your paper is probably ACS AMI level. Advanced Materials papers are usually not debatable, they're either clearly paradigm-level or they're not. Submitting to Advanced Materials when the work is ACS AMI level costs you 2-4 months in desk rejection time.
A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can give you an honest assessment of whether your materials paper is competitive at Advanced Materials or whether ACS AMI is the strategic choice.
Publication costs compared
Cost | Advanced Materials | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |
|---|---|---|
Subscription publication | $0 | $0 (no page/color charges) |
Gold OA option | ~$5,510 (Wiley) | ~$5,000 (ACS AuthorChoice) |
Institutional agreements | Wiley Open Access Account | ACS Read & Publish |
Both journals allow $0 subscription publication. ACS AMI is notable for charging no page or color charges at all, even for subscription papers with color figures. If your institution has agreements with both publishers, cost is not a differentiator. If you're paying out of pocket for OA, both are in the $5,000-$5,500 range.
Bottom line
Advanced Materials if your contribution is a material breakthrough. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces if your contribution is a functional application with strong performance. Both pathways lead to respected publications. Choose based on the strength and type of your novelty, not on which journal has a higher IF.
The most common mistake: submitting to Advanced Materials when the work is genuinely excellent applied materials research. This costs 2-4 months in desk rejection and delays publication at ACS AMI where the work belongs. A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can give you an honest read on journal fit before you commit.
The materials journal landscape: where these two sit
Journal | IF (JCR 2024) | Publisher | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
Nature Materials | 38.5 | Springer Nature | Fundamental materials breakthroughs |
Advanced Materials | 26.8 | Wiley | Novel materials with fundamental insight |
Advanced Functional Materials | 19.0 | Wiley | Functional materials with performance focus |
ACS Nano | 16.0 | ACS | Nanoscale materials and devices |
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces | 8.2 | ACS | Applied materials with functional demonstration |
Chemistry of Materials | 7.3 | ACS | Synthesis and structure of new materials |
Journal of Materials Chemistry A | 9.5 | RSC | Renewable energy and sustainability materials |
If Advanced Materials desk-rejects, the natural step down within Wiley is Advanced Functional Materials (IF 19.0). If ACS AMI desk-rejects, the step down within ACS is Chemistry of Materials (IF 7.3) or ACS Applied Energy Materials (IF 5.4).
A Advanced Materials vs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces scope check can identify which tier in this landscape your paper fits before you commit to a submission. The scan takes 60 seconds.
Frequently asked questions
Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research.
Choose Advanced Materials if your materials advance is novel enough to drive new research.
Choose based on scope fit, audience, and your paper's specific strengths. The decision aids above outline when each journal is the better choice.
Sources
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: whether the package is ready, what drives desk rejection, how journals compare, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Checklist system / operational asset
Elite Submission Checklist
A flagship pre-submission checklist that turns journal-fit, desk-reject, and package-quality lessons into one operational final-pass audit.
Flagship report / decision support
Desk Rejection Report
A canonical desk-rejection report that organizes the most common editorial failure modes, what they look like, and how to prevent them.
Dataset / reference hub
Journal Intelligence Dataset
A canonical journal dataset that combines selectivity posture, review timing, submission requirements, and Manusights fit signals in one citeable reference asset.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Final step
See whether this paper fits ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Run the Free Readiness Scan with ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces as your target journal and get a manuscript-specific fit signal before you commit.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
Supporting reads
Conversion step
See whether this paper fits ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.