Journal Guides3 min readUpdated Apr 6, 2026

Applied Physics Letters Impact Factor

Applied Physics Letters impact factor is 3.6. See the current rank, quartile, and what the number actually means before you submit.

By Senior Researcher, Physics

Senior Researcher, Physics

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation for physics journals, with direct experience navigating submissions to Physical Review Letters, Nature Physics, and APS-family journals.

Journal evaluation

Want the full picture on Applied Physics Letters?

See scope, selectivity, submission context, and what editors actually want before you decide whether Applied Physics Letters is realistic.

Open Applied Physics Letters GuideAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan
Metric context

A fuller snapshot for authors

Use Applied Physics Letters's impact factor as one signal, then stack it against selectivity, editorial speed, and the journal guide before you decide where to submit.

Open full journal guide
Impact factor3.6Current JIF
Acceptance rate~40-50%Overall selectivity
First decision~60-90 days medianProcess speed

What this metric helps you decide

  • Whether Applied Physics Letters has the citation profile you want for this paper.
  • How the journal compares to nearby options when prestige or visibility matters.
  • Whether the citation upside is worth the likely selectivity and process tradeoffs.

What you still need besides JIF

  • Scope fit and article-type fit, which matter more than a high number.
  • Desk-rejection risk, which impact factor does not predict.
  • Timeline and cost context.

Five-year impact factor: 4.5. These longer-window metrics help show whether the journal's citation performance is stable beyond a single JIF snapshot.

Submission context

How authors actually use Applied Physics Letters's impact factor

Use the number to place the journal in the right tier, then check the harder filters: scope fit, selectivity, and editorial speed.

Use this page to answer

  • Is Applied Physics Letters actually above your next-best alternatives, or just more famous?
  • Does the prestige upside justify the likely cost, delay, and selectivity?
  • Should this journal stay on the shortlist before you invest in submission prep?

Check next

  • Acceptance rate: ~40-50%. High JIF does not tell you how hard triage will be.
  • First decision: ~60-90 days median. Timeline matters if you are under a grant, job, or revision clock.
  • Publishing cost and article type, since those constraints can override prestige.

Quick answer

Applied Physics Letters has a 2024 JCR impact factor of 3.6. The right use of that number is not to compare APL to chemistry or materials flagships. It is to decide whether your paper really belongs in a fast, concise applied-physics letters format where the main value is a clear device, measurement, or application-facing physics result. If the physics needs a full-length argument or the strongest audience is outside applied physics, the metric is not the deciding factor.

At a glance

Metric
Value
Impact Factor
3.6
5-Year JIF
3.5
Quartile
Q2 (Physics, Applied)
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Format
Letters (short papers, typically 3-4 pages)

Data sourced from our analysis of 20,449 journals in the Clarivate JCR 2024 database.

What 3.6 means for applied physics

APL's IF of 3.6 should be read in context. Applied physics has lower citation density than chemistry, materials science, or biomedical fields. Within the applied physics ecosystem, APL is the go-to letters journal for quick publication of applied physics results. The journal publishes approximately 4,000 letters per year, making it a high-volume venue.

The stable five-year JIF (3.5) matching the two-year (3.6) indicates consistent citation performance. APL papers are cited steadily over time rather than experiencing citation spikes.

Is the APL impact factor going up or down?

Year
Impact Factor
2017
~3.5
2018
~3.6
2019
~3.6
2020
~3.8
2021
~3.9
2022
~3.5
2023
~3.5
2024
3.6

APL has been remarkably stable in the 3.5-3.9 range, reflecting the consistent citation behavior of the applied physics field. This stability makes the number trustworthy for planning.

How APL compares

Journal
IF (2024)
What it usually rewards
Applied Physics Letters
3.6
Applied physics letters (broad)
Physical Review Applied
4.4
Applied physics with PRL-style rigor
Journal of Applied Physics
2.7
Full-length applied physics articles
Nano Letters
9.1
Nanoscience letters (higher impact, narrower)
Advanced Materials
26.8
Materials with high functional impact

APL vs Journal of Applied Physics is the AIP internal comparison. JAP (IF 2.7) publishes full-length articles where APL publishes letters. If your paper needs 3-4 pages, submit to APL. If it needs full-length treatment, JAP is the natural home.

APL vs Physical Review Applied (IF 3.8) is the cross-society comparison. PRA has a slightly higher IF and a PRL-style editorial process. APL is faster and accepts a broader range of applied physics.

The philosophical difference matters: APL's desk rejection for "timeliness" is widely misunderstood as a novelty requirement. It is not. A paper can report genuinely new results and still be rejected from APL because the subfield is considered mature by editors. APL's role is to move applied physics forward, not to archive solid incremental work in established areas. Physical Review Applied is more willing to publish rigorous advances in established subfields as long as the methodology contributes. Authors who treat these two journals as equivalents often discover that the timeliness filter at APL is what separates them.

What Pre-Submission Reviews Reveal About Applied Physics Letters Submissions

In our pre-submission review work with manuscripts targeting Applied Physics Letters, three failure patterns generate the most consistent desk rejections. Each maps to criteria APL's editorial policies name explicitly.

Results in a mature field failing the timeliness criterion. The editorial policies state directly: "A fraction of papers, which report new results but in a mature field, do not fulfill the condition of timeliness required by APL." Timeliness is one of three critical publication considerations alongside novelty and significance. This is a distinct failure mode: a paper can report correct, new results and still be desk rejected because the subfield is considered mature by the editors. Incremental advances in well-established areas, minor device optimization of a decades-old structure, small improvements to a known deposition process, are returned without review on timeliness grounds. APL is a letters journal competing on speed and impact; the papers it publishes need to matter now, not just eventually.

No real-world application path, outside the mission scope. The editorial policy states manuscripts are rejected when they "do not fit the mission of APL." APL's stated mission is "rapid publication of short experimental and theoretical papers related to applications of physics phenomena in all branches of science, engineering, and modern technology." The operative word is applications. Fundamental physics papers without a discernible device, technology, or engineering application trajectory are outside scope. Pure materials characterization without device integration, and purely theoretical work without experimental or application context, are rejected at desk. The standard redirect is to AIP Advances, which accepts solid work outside APL's applied-physics scope.

Exceeding the 3,000-word letter format or using full-article structure. The author instructions state: "Normally, papers longer than 3000 words will be rejected, and the authors will be required to shorten the paper and submit it again as a new manuscript." This is an automatic, format-based rejection trigger, not a scientific judgment. The 3,000-word limit covers all text including figure and table captions, excluding only the title, author list, abstract, acknowledgments, data availability statement, references, and equations/figures/tables. APL additionally prohibits section headings in letters: the paper opens directly with introductory text without an "Introduction" heading. Papers formatted as full articles with conventional section structure are inconsistent with the letters format and are rejected on that basis alone.

A Applied Physics Letters submission readiness check can assess whether the applied-physics application case is explicit, whether the paper meets the timeliness test for a current subfield, and whether the manuscript length and format are within the letters constraints before submission.

Should you submit?

Submit if:

  • the result can be communicated in a 3-4 page letter format
  • the work is applied physics with a clear device, measurement, or application result
  • you want fast publication in an AIP-indexed venue
  • the scope covers applied physics broadly (optics, semiconductors, thin films, acoustics, etc.)

Think twice if:

  • the paper needs full-length treatment (Journal of Applied Physics is better)
  • the work is nanoscience that would benefit from Nano Letters' higher visibility
  • Advanced Materials or a specialty journal would reach a better audience for the specific application
  • Physical Review Applied's more rigorous review would strengthen the paper's credibility

A Applied Physics Letters submission readiness check can help assess scope fit and format suitability before submitting.

When the IF helps and when it misleads

  • Helps when deciding between APL and Journal of Applied Physics for the same audience
  • Helps when the result is compact and strong enough for the letters format
  • Misleads when the paper needs full-length treatment to be convincing
  • Misleads when comparing APL against journals serving different fields and citation cultures

What the impact factor does not measure

The impact factor for Applied Physics Letters measures average citations per paper over 2 years. It does not measure the quality of any individual paper, the prestige within a specific subfield, or whether the journal is the right fit for your work. A high IF does not guarantee your paper will be cited, and a lower IF does not mean the journal lacks influence in its specialty.

Impact factors also do not account for field-specific citation patterns. Journals in clinical medicine accumulate citations faster than journals in mathematics or ecology. Comparing IFs across fields is misleading.

Before choosing this journal based on IF alone, a Applied Physics Letters submission readiness check assesses whether your manuscript fits the journal's actual editorial scope.

Before you submit

A Applied Physics Letters desk-rejection risk check scores fit against the journal's editorial bar.

What APL's IF of ~3.5 means in physics

Applied Physics Letters (AIP/APS, IF ~3.5) publishes short-format letters on applied physics. The IF is modest compared to Nature Physics (IF ~19) or PRL (IF ~8.6), but APL occupies a distinct niche: fast publication of applied physics results that do not require the broad significance of PRL.

APL does not evaluate perceived significance, it evaluates technical soundness and applied physics relevance. The letter format (4 pages maximum) rewards concise, focused results. The journal publishes ~10,000 letters per year, making it one of the highest-volume physics journals.

APL does not charge page charges. OA option at ~$2,500 (AIP pricing).

A Applied Physics Letters submission readiness check scores desk-reject risk.

Frequently asked questions

3.6 (JCR 2024), Q2 in Physics Applied. The five-year JIF is 3.5, indicating remarkably stable citation performance. APL has stayed in the 3.5-3.9 range for the past decade.

Yes, within applied physics. APL is AIP Publishing's flagship letters venue, publishing approximately 4,000 letters per year. The IF of 3.6 is modest cross-field but strong for applied physics, where citation density is lower than chemistry or biomedical fields.

APL for letters (3-4 pages with one sharp applied-physics point). Journal of Applied Physics (IF 2.5) for full-length articles needing complete derivations and extended data. Same publisher, same community, different formats.

Stable. APL has been in the 3.5-3.9 range since 2017, with a small pandemic-era peak at 3.9 in 2021 followed by normalization. This stability makes the number trustworthy for long-term planning.

Applied physics has lower citation density than chemistry, materials science, or biomedical fields. Within the applied physics ecosystem, APL's IF of 3.6 is competitive. Compare to Physical Review Applied (3.8) and Journal of Applied Physics (2.5), not to Advanced Materials (26.8).

References

Sources

  1. Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (latest JCR release used for this page)
  2. Applied Physics Letters author resources
  3. Applied Physics Letters journal homepage

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: whether the package is ready, what drives desk rejection, how journals compare, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Want the full picture on Applied Physics Letters?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Applied Physics Letters Guide